Indførte i Formelen: Correction = N + et + 8 h 
give disse Observationer folgende Ligninger til at bestemme 
N, @ og BP: 
2 
a 
| 
| 
| 
| 
6 
Introduced into the formula: 
Correction = N + at + 8 h, 
these observations give the following equations for determ- 
ining N, ca, and $: 
No. Nå bet hø ==" Om Cr es © 8, 
I NE 188 ad of = = 0-07 0".00 + 0.07 
2 NE gg ot of oe == 0:08 | 5 0:08 | = 8 
3 N+ 11.3 at o0 8 — 0.03 | + 0.03 — 6 
4 iy Oho oy = — 0 .03 + 0.03 — 6 
5 NE nog 2 of = + 0.07 + 0.04 — 3 
6 Net og w+ of =sS + 0.07 + 0.05 — 2 
7 NEON DE + 0.07 + 0.03 + 4 
8 N= og @-- 708 = + 0.03 + 0.12 — 9 
9 N — 06 a@ 4 4018 + 0.13 + 0.13 fo) 
10 Ms ie @flaye = JE © 24 180014 + 10 
I I N 2 110 @ ab ae = — © .20 + 0.03 + 17 
12 Mao of ge gif = 0.00 + 0.06 — 6 
13 Nee 90 GE 24606 = — 0.05 + 0 .06 — 11 
14 NES 08 GE gig = + 0.38 S2002 | 220 
15 N I 15 @ 18618 = — 0.02 — 0.02 ) 
16 N— 1.25 @ +153908 = — 0.04 + 0.01 -— 5 
17 N — 1.35 @ ++ 6018, = + 0.15 + 0.12 —- 3 
Ved de mindste Kvadraters Methode findes | By the method of the least squares we find 
N & LE o957% å S&S = GØ1910, p = — G6001 13459 | N = + 0171, @ = — 0.01216, 6 = — 0.00011345; 
og altsaa Correction for No. V = and hence the correction for No. V = 
+ 07.171 — 0.01216 t — o.000113 h. + 0.171 — 0.01216 t — 0.000113 h. 
De efter denne Formel beregnede Correctioner ere 
opførte under Rubrikken Ber. Corr. og Forskjellerne mellem 
de observerede og beregnede Correctioner i Rubrikken O —B: 
Af den sidste faaes MF = + 0.072. 
Som man ser, ere de enkelte Correctionsled af samme 
Orden som ved de øvrige Miller-Casella-Thermometre. De 
tre Sammenligninger med No. VIL ere noget usikkre, da 
dette Thermometer (se nedenfor) i 1876 viste paafaldende 
Forandringer i Skalacorrectionen til forskjellige Tider. Til 
ovenstaaende Beregning har jeg for No. VII benyttet de 
Skalacorrectioner, der ere udledede af den Dagen før 
gjorte Sammenligning med Normalthermometret 1 Forbin- 
delse med den til No. VII svarende Verdi af Coeffi- 
cienten ca. 
Miller-Casella No. VI. 
Nulpunkt-Correction. 
1877. Juli 10. + 0". og Tromsø. 
1878. Juli 23. + 0. 13 Ved Beeren Miland. 
Nov. 29. -- o. 14 Christiania. 
Middel + 0.120 WON == 55 ©'O2QOc 
The corrections computed according to this formula 
are given in the Column Corr. Comp., and the dif- 
ferences between the observed and computed corrections 
in Column O—B. From the latter we get MF = + 0°.072. 
As will be seen, the several terms of correction 
are of the same order as for the other Miller-Casella 
thermometers. The three comparisons with No. VII are 
somewhat untrustworthy, that instrument (see below) hav- 
ing shown in 1876 striking changes in the scale-correction 
at various times. When making the above computation 
for No. VII, I used the scale-corrections found the day 
before from the comparison with the Standard-Thermo- 
meter, together with the value of the coefficient @ cor- 
responding to No. VII. 
Miller-Casella No. VI. 
Zero-Correction. 
1877. July 10. + 0". 09 Tromsø. 
1878. July 23. + o. 13 off Beeren Hiland. 
= Nov. 29. —+ o. 14 Christiania. 
i Mean + 0° 1200 MEF = IP 0020 
