Ornithology of Borneo. 35 
Marshall to keep the Bornean bird distinct from C. hayi of 
Malacca. The female is precisely like the male. 
17. MEGALEMA MYSTACOPHONUS. 
Chotorea mystacophonus (Temm.); Salvad. J.c. p. 34, t. 1. 
a, b,c. “No. 33. 92. Jambusan, Sept. 12, 1874. - Iris 
chocolate ; legs greenish.” 
d.‘°g. Jambusan, Sept. 9, 1874.” 
Three specimens now sent by Mr. Everett are in the 
state of plumage described by the Messrs. Marshall as M. 
humii. They are all different one from the other, but show 
pretty conclusively that the last-named species cannot be up- 
held. The five figures given in Count Salvadori’s work prove 
this also; and Mr. Everett’s specimens show the gradual trans- 
ition from green- to bright-plumaged birds. At the same 
time he has also sent a full-plumaged male example, killed in 
the same locality ; and I do not think there can be the shghtest 
doubt as:to the absolute identity of M. hum with M. mys- 
tacophonus. 
18. MrcGaL®MA VERSICOLOR. 
Chotorea versicolor (Rafil.) ; Salvad. l.c. p. 33. 
a. “No.75. ¢. Kucking, August 1874. Iris cho- 
eolate.”’ 
b. “2. Jambusan, Sept. 11, 1874. Iris chocolate ; legs 
pale greenish.” 
19. MeGaLe#MA DUVAUCELI. 
Xantholema duvauceli (Less.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 38. 
a. “No.11l. ¢. Jambusan, Sept. 12, 1874. Iris cho- 
colate; legs greenish.” 
20. CaLLoLopHuUS MALACCENSIS (Lath.) ; Salvad. J. c. 
p. 50. | 
ae INO AOA 9 ts OADM it 
b. “9. Matu, August 1873.” 
But little difference is to be seen in the sexes, according to 
the two specimens now sent. The bars on the back are much 
more distinct in the female; but this may be partly due to 
the worn plumage of the male bird. 
D2 


