; 
M : 
bs] 
| | 
be 
it 
oF | 
OP 
Eh 
% 
in 
f 










436 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on 
institute the comparison which appears in the following 
table :— 7 
A. White down: (1) Smew, (2) Golden-eye. 
B. White-tipped down: (1) Pintail, (2) Widgeon. 
C. Large dark down, without white tips: (1) Black Scoter, 
(2) Velvet Scoter, (3) Scaup. 
D. Small dark down, without white tips: (1) Long-tailed 
Duck, (2) Shoveller, (3) Teal. 
A. White. 
(1) Smew. Down large, greyish white. 
(2) Golden-eye. Down scarcely to be distinguished from 
the last, but has a slight bluish tinge; bluish white. 
B. White-tipped. 
(1) Pintail. Down smaller, brown, with pale centres, in- 
distinctly tipped with white. 
(2) Widgeon. Down larger, darker brown than Pintail’s, 
pale centres, long and conspicuous white tips. 
C. Large dark, without white tips. 
(1) Black Scoter. Down medium size, darker brown than 
Pintail’s, lighter than Widgeon’s, centres pale but conspicuous. 
(2) Velvet Scoter. Down larger than Black Scoter’s, darker 
than Pintail’s or Widgeon’s, centres less conspicuous than 
Black Scoter’s. 
(3) Scaup. Down about same size as Velvet Scoter’s, 
but darker, centres inconspicuous. 
D. Small dark, without white tips. 
(1) Long-tailed Duck. Down small, darkish brown, with 
pale centres. 
(2) Shoveller. Down small, darker than Long-tailed Duck’s, 
pale centres. 
(3) Teal. Down small, darker Lfdiwer than either Long- 
tailed Duck’s or Shoveller’s, pale centres. 
Note. The above downs were examined in bulk in a clear 
but not too bright light, and in the absence of direct rays of 

