MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 143 
this puzzling group are better understood, a description of Z Lawi may be 
given. 
Zonites placentula, W. G. Binn. (not of Shuttleworth), Terr. Moll. U. S., V. 124, 
Fig. 44, not description. 
Mountains of Tennessee and North Carolina. 
There is a variety in which is a heavy internal callus or plate like teeth 
within the aperture. 
This species furnished the lingual membrane described in Vol. V. as that of 
Z. capsella. } 
Zonites fulvus, Mtr. (p. 125.) 
The dentate form sometimes has radiating rows of teeth, as in multidentatus. 
Zonites Stearnsi, Branp. (p. 130.) 
This species from the ribbed form of its jaw must be considered a Microphysa 
(see below). , 
Zonites cuspidatus, Lewis. (p. 118.) 
Plate Ii. Fig. C. 
This form, previously referred by me to a variety of Z. cerwnoideus, may be 
considered a distinct species, or a form of gularis. It is not a variety of ceri- 
noideus (see p. 111). The internal tooth-like processes within the aperture 
strongly curved one towards the other form almost an arched space. The um- 
bilicus is closed. 
Found by Miss Law in Monroe Co., Tennessee; by Mrs. Andrews on Roan 
Mountain, Mitchell Co., North Carolina. 
Zonites macilentus, Sutvrrt. 
Plate II. Fig. B. 
Formerly I referred this to Z.‘lasmodon, but having received specimens from 
near Shuttleworth’s original locality, I am convinced of its being distinct. The 
original description is given in Vol. III. p. 20. 
It is found in the mountains of Tennessee and North Carolina. 
Zonites lasmodon, Puituies. (p. 181). 
The caudal mucus pore is erect, not the simple longitudinal slit as in 
‘4. suppressus (see Fig. on p. 128). 
