- NO. 1623. NOMENCLATURE OF RECENT CRINOIDS—CLARK. 517 
Decametrocrinus rugosus A. H. CuarK, 1908. 
1908. A. H. Cuarx, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XXXIV, p. 215. 
Type-locality—Oft Bird Island, Hawaiian Islands; 762-1,000 
fathoms. U.S. S. Albatross. 
PUG OSUS=LUoOse. U.S. National Museum. 
Democrinus Perrier, 1883. 
1883. Prrrier, Comptes Rendus, XCVI, No. 7, p. 450. 
Type.—Democrinus parfaiti Perrier (n.sp.) | =Rhizocrinus raw- 
son Pourtales]. 
déue=to build+«pivoy=lily. 
Democrinus parfaiti Prrrizr, 1883. 
1885. Perrier, Comptes Rendus, XCVI, No. 7, p. 450. 
Ty pe-locality.—Off the coast of Morocco, near Cape Blanc; 1,900 
meters. [French 8. 8. 7ravadleur. 
M. T. Parfait, commander of the Zravailleur. Paris Museum. 
(?) Diteropus RarirnesquE, 1815. 
1815. Rarinesqur, Analyse de la Nature, p. 153. 
A nomen nudum. 
Possibly an Ophiuroid; no type is mentioned. 
[tEnerinus ScnHuuzn, 1760; Nor BINOMIAL; see following. | 
+Encrinus ANpREAE, 1763. 
1763. AnpreAr, Hannoverische Magazin, 1763; reprinted in 
Awnpreas, Briefe aus der Schweiz nach Hannover beschrieben 
in dem Jare 1763, p. 4 (1776). 
Type.—Encrinus coralloides (n. sp.), founded on BrtécKner Ver- 
such einer Beschreibung historisch und nattirlicher Merk- 
wtrdigkeiten der Landschaft Basel, Part 6, pl. figs. g, h, 4, 
ke, 1, m (1748). 
év=in+«pivov=lily. 
According to Bather, Hnerinus dates from Scuuuze, Betrach- 
tung der versteinerten Seesterne und ihrer Theile, p. 27, No. 
17 (1760); this work is, however, non-binomial, and can not, 
therefore, serve as the original reference for any names em- 
ployed according to the present usages in nomenclature. Schulze 
uses the names in a purely historical sense, and takes all of them 
from previous authors, and he says of Hncrinus, “ Man findet 
gewisse Versteinerung, die, in Ansehung ihrer Gestalt, einige 
Gleichert mit einer Lilie zu haben scheinert; daher man dieselbe 
anfinglich fiir die Versteinerung dieser Blume gehalten, und 
sie die Lilienstein, ENcrrnum gennenen hat,” showing that he 
was merely repeating the name by which these fossils were known 
to pre-Linnean authors. It should be noticed that Schulze makes 
no reference whatever to Linnaeus’ work. While it would save 
Proc. N. M. vol. xxxiv—-08——34 
