192705: Pilsbry-Bequaert, The Aquatic Mollusks of the Belgian Congo 307 
Hautteceuria jouberti BoURGUIGNAT, 1888, ‘Iconogr. Malacol. Tanganika,’ 
Pl. vir, figs. 24-25; 1890, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool., (7) X, p. 107, Pl. vir, figs. 24-25. 
Kibanga. 
Hautteceuria lavigeriana Bourauienat, 1888, ‘Iconogr. Malacol. Tanganika,’ 
Pl. vii, figs. 26-27; 1890, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool,, (7) A, Polis, Pls wat, Aes. 26-27. 
Painiseeg, 
Hautteceuria macrostoma BouRGUIGNAT, 1888, ‘Iconogr. Malacol. Tanganika,’ 
Pl. vu, figs. 10-11; 1890, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool., (7) X, p. 97, Pl. vii, figs. 10-11. Pam- 
bete. 
Hautieceuria moineti BouRGUIGNAT, 1888, ‘Iconogr. Malacol. Tanganika,’ Pl. 
vil, figs. 4-5; 1890, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool. (7) X, p. 95, Pl. vu, figs. 4-5. Kibanga. 
Hautteceuria pusilla Bowneuuaiuly, 1888, eas Motaoat Tanganika,’ PI. 
vill, figs. 32-34; 1890, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool., (7) X, p. 119, Pl. vit, figs. 32-34. Mpala 
(typical) and a variety at Pambete. 
Hautteceuria servainiana BoureuiIeNnat, 1888, ‘Iconogr. Malacol. Tanganika,’ 
Pl. vi, figs. 18-19; 1890, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool., (7) X, p. 116, Pl. vit, figs. 18-19. 
' Kibanga and near the achat of the Luandazi Riven, 
Hautteceuria singularis BourRGuUIGNAT, 1885, ‘Notice Prodrom. Moll. Giraud 
Tanganika,’ p. 52; 1888, ‘Iconogr. Malacol. Tanganika,’ Pl. vir, figs. 22-23; 1890, 
Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool., (7) X, p. 106, Pl. vit, figs. 22-23. Pambete. 
STANLEYA Bourguignat 
Stanleya BouRGuIGNAT, 1885, ‘Notice Prodrom. Moll. Giraud Tanganika,’ p. 86. 
Type by original Aeanenation: LInthoglyphus neritoides E. A. Smith (error for neri- 
tinoides) (not Stanleya of Bourguignat, 1888, nor of Smith, 1904). _ 
Rumella Bourauienat, 1885, ‘Notice Prodrom. Moll. Giraud Patera? p. 
89. For Rumella giraudi Rounrneant and R. milne-edwardsiana Bourguignat, both 
apparently synonyms of Lithoglyphus neritinoides E. A. Smith. Type by egos 
designation: Rumella giraudi Bourguignat. 
As pointed out by H. B. Baker (1923, Proc. Ac. Nat. Sc. Philadel- 
phia, LX XV, p. 174) the fact that Bourguignat had apparently mis- 
identified Smith’s Lnthoglyphus neritinoides in no way invalidates his 
designation of that species as the genotype of Stanleya, since he referred 
to Smith’s species by page and figure, and it was later, in 1888, that he 
figured a different species as Stanleya neritoides and his error became 
manifest. | 
Stanleya neritinoides (E. A. Smith) 
Text Figure 60a-b 
Lithoglyphus neritinoides KE, A. Smrru, 1880, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., (5) VI, p. 426; 
1881, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 287, Pl. xxx111, fig. 19. 
Tanganyicia (?) neritinoides E. A. Smith. Crossz, 1881, Journ. de Conchyl., 
XXX oo eee: 
Stanleya neritoides E. A. Smith. Roe cnenawt: 1885, ‘Notice Prodrom. Moll. 
Giraud Tanganika,’ p. 87. 
