A peer-reviewed open-access journal Zookeys 909: 79-158 (2020) doi: 10.3897/zookeys.909.46838 RESEARCH ARTICLE #$ZooKey S http:/ / ZOO keys -pen soft. net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group (Diptera, Syrphidae) Ante Vuji¢c', Laura Likov', Snezana Radenkovi¢', Natasa Kodis Tubi¢', Mihajla Djan', Anja Sebic', Celeste Pérez-Bafidén’, Anatolij Barkalov’, Riistem Hayat’, Santos Rojo’, Andrijana Andri¢*, Gunilla Stahls® | University of Novi Sad, Department of Biology and Ecology, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 2, Novi Sad, Serbia 2 Department of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences III, Campus of San Vicen- te, University of Alicante, Spain 3 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, Russia 4 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz Uni- versity, Antalya, Turkey § University of Novi Sad, BioSense Institute, Dr Zorana Dindica 1, Novi Sad, Serbia 6 Zoology Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, University of Helsinki, Finland Corresponding author: Laura Likov (laura.likov@dbe.uns.ac.rs) Academic editor: X. Mengual | Received 27 September 2019 | Accepted 11 December 2019 | Published 5 February 2020 http://zoobank. org/22B7FF 16-D0A2-40F9-B20E-F7C6E0AF 1842 Citation: Vuji¢ A, Likov L, Radenkovié S, Kocis Tubi¢é N, Djan M, Sebié A, Pérez-Bafién C, Barkalov A, Hayat R, Rojo S, Andrié A, Stahls G (2020) Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group (Diptera, Syrphidae). ZooKeys 909: 79-158. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838 Abstract The phytophagous hoverfly genus Merodon Meigen, 1803 (Diptera, Syrphidae), which comprises more than 160 species distributed in Palaearctic and Afrotropical regions, can be differentiated into multiple groups of species that harbor high levels of hidden diversity. In this work, the serrulatus species group of Merodon is revised, providing an illustrated key to species, a detailed discussion on the taxonomic char- acters and a morphological diagnosis, including also the first data about the preimaginal morphology of this species group. The study includes characteristics of the 13 species of the M. serrulatus group, along with the available distributional data. Moreover, descriptions are provided for seven new species, namely M. defectus Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov., M. disjunctus Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov., medium Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov., M. nigrocapillatus Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov., !/. nigropunctum Vujic, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov., M/Z. opacus Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovi¢ sp. nov., and M. trianguloculus Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov. In addition, the taxa M. serrulatus (Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822), M. bequaerti Hurkmans, 1993, M. hirsutus Sack, 1913, M. kawamurae Matsumura, 1916, M. sacki (Paramonov, 1936) and M. sophron Hurkmans, 1993 are redefined and redescribed. Following a detailed study of the type material sourced from different entomological collections, the status of all avail- Copyright Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 80 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) able taxa related to M. serrulatus is revised and a new synonymy is proposed: M. tener Sack, 1913 syn. nov. (junior synonym of M. serrulatus). The identity of M. trizonus (Szilady, 1940) could not be assessed as the type specimens are lost. Thus, the name M. trizonus is considered as nomen dubium. The monophyly and composition of this species group are assessed through Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood analyses of the mitochondrial COI and nuclear 28S rRNA gene sequences. Keywords 28S rRNA, COI, immature stages, lectotype, morphology, new species, new synonyms, taxonomy Table of contents Tinte@eltneti aia See 2 me Oe ae eee cree ae ee er ee ee 81 Materials aicitet ROO Sp aren sre atamet tissu tthe de pda ath OT aged ste ten sd ath Ted SONzets el 82 Mate rial ek ATIN TCAs crtasn ss eagnecereenes re he vetroube tigen si¥p ve ba pe eWPe tevatee tepPap seiesdnecuey danloee te 82 Tiisrrtcetionmall Acre niyiias exe ctecc vcs sous toa ete ast tica cave da gh Mee eatcse sath tone ese code Bocane roosts es 83 (Pexceinorde Stel. On ACHES i tstcee 8 Selec a Tie ete AB Snes kt ness a out Balogh pownenns 84 ‘Tie stuchy-Ob pretmaginal monn Glogye.t a ced. te Minicee tennis auth che EnSabon ut cl 84 Wiech aired S15 cue Soot sesina Sires cag/ Ble nantes Stas Ue staat otvines evar ee Bh abel eatin ovateens 85 EROS ULES eect eee re ee ree tient te ic eee ee ee ee 86 VL CVO LON SOIUU TALIS ORONA 5 seas sndeen hi detin nba Hekate cee Bean tedebad ached alee Srkaneehaaaginde hdecdastapaeee 86 Taxonomy and nomenclature of the species belonging to the Merodon serrulatus SPECICSCOTOM DL is hy liel coherence ta shiie vlebas ebidre iach ale vbacklrpiiled ns eis iuubacsTh plaebais vbelcts all Merad on DEAUAEr IT AUER DNA NID. .sctinaratele sepstn Aieein cop tenes axeumivaronnased eae nereies 91 Merodon defectus Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov. .....cseeeeseeeeeeeseeeseeeeeees 98 Merodon disjunctus Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov.....csceseeeeeeeseeseereees 103 WAV Od OR UAIVSIEFLES SACI POF 8a ooo stot ols att esos ah ocain etn ck etdodalsuanecesecbeuserctica ston. 106 Merodon kawamurae Matsumura, 1916............ccccsssseseccosssecccessvsccccevsecccacevess 110 Merodon medium Vujic, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov. ......sceseeeeeseceneeeneeeeees 13 Merodon nigrocapillatus Vujic, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov........eeeeeeseeseees 116 Merodon nigropunctum Vujic, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov. .....eeeeeeeeseeeeees bhp Merodon opacus Vuji¢é, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov.......eeeseeseeseeeeeseeeseeseees 121 Merodonsackit Patain@niove LIS GO) iceeoccsedeankss oc hacsplandistoces tunes tepccededaoeeelodeed 128 Merodon serrulatus (Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822)... .eseeeeseeseeeeeseeeseeeeees 129 Merodonsophron Aurkimarisn 993) x. cvcisecuisnesenese lemeravecncontderteersededecnessecstet 135 Merodon trianguloculus Vuji¢, Likov & Radenkovié sp. nov. ......ceeeeeeeeeeseees 137 Merodon trizonus (Szilady, 1940) nomen AUbium ...eecccecccssecssscessseeststesetseeen 140 Key to the Merodon serrulatus species SOUP .......sssssesssesseseceseeseeesecneseaeeeeeseeaees 140 IMIGLECUIAE MN CLEDCG. seni eto sde tt anise eeteale uni eks eter ace der Marmuwarenst 143 TEVISGUSSTOR Es. leadh asthe tas ctioanl eee an subtnenu aust tnaesch Vahpitats betes fut atabedloacot edad. ence Raden 145 Taxon delimitation andsinteerative taAxOmonay sc. See top teestacacencoecthe sae aay seeet verona 145 TYR ATURE SEAS tessa sc tsnsuge cytaeaaasaescvensg abba te hpdiess teeta cahaaedethledetadbeegearwatan cased 146 istry bution ali cssPeCle NAIVET SILVA: is. hatin acebeie yeosladiasleenqeatsetensiedeecsneteestecoqeal 147 Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 81 NCR OW EC CTTETIEG ansioun,.c.Waceanicns ole nissnl ai agearohsedD Juadlin wether opus obs edutuaabingedenas 148 FRG LOCI CES ech antes leer TI sale i et Rn Aaa OE lM, A Aeon Oe 149 Supplemientaty: matetial sls yresc nse A naemaneasscarennmsntneet braserau seh Rees aie Releases h55 SU p le MiGhca ys Md Abe MAINS 5.5, Meeeies 05,6 OB ofa he meet A MCh Se eek nat etre kag alate 155 Slop lemGiiaty inate mercer MNP ee a LIE a Rh en, dere 156 Supplentenwbaty arate rial At ee ees 5 ee es, eee ee ee 156 Slip wle trie meat yer Aerial wo) erie te: sat Bu. Mee eee a See ee, 8 Bese 157 Supp lementatysriate ral@ Wns cu Oi a doit e ler Baer ah 157 SU LENT Mba oT AO LIAL rca. las teats Pa tes eptecac hoe O as or tee Maccecse cate nea eee eataceer 158 Supplemeritary material’ 2.5 ticesseus souies, consent cesgens soetsge pees et eee sees Tae catees 158 Introduction The phytophagous hoverfly genus Merodon Meigen, 1803 contains more than 160 spe- cies distributed across the Palaearctic and Afrotropical regions (Stahls et al. 2009). Adults mimic bees and bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and feed on pollen and nectar from early spring to autumn (Hurkmans 1993; Speight 2018). Based on the immature stages of Merodon found to date, underground storage organs (bulbs, corms and rhizomes) of geophytes of the families Asparagaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Iridaceae are larval micro- habitats of this taxon and phytophagy is its feeding mode (Ricarte et al. 2017; Preradovic et al. 2018). The immature stages of only eight Merodon species have been described to date (Heiss 1938; Stuckenberg 1956; Ricarte et al. 2008, 2017; Andrié et al. 2014; Preradovié et al. 2018) and a detailed literature review on the immature stages of Mero- don, including host plants, has recently been published by Ricarte et al. (2017). The taxonomic status and identification of many Merodon species requires further investigation, as the genus contains a high number of species groups consisting of morphologically cryptic taxa with very subtle morphological differences. In various recent publications, an integrative taxonomic approach combining morphological and molecular information has been adopted and resulted useful in resolving taxonomic ambiguities in hoverflies, e.g., in Merodon equestris species complex (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2011), Merodon avidus complex (Popovié et al. 2015; Acanski et al. 2016), Merodon aureus species group (Sasié et al. 2016), genus Chrysotoxum Meigen, 1803 (Nedeljkovi¢ et al. 2013, 2015) and Melanostoma Schiner, 1860 (Haarto and Stahls 2014). Most recent publications pertaining to the genus Merodon have focused on par- ticular species groups, within which the authors delimited individual species (Vuji¢ et al. 2012, 2013, 2015; Acanski et al. 2016; Sagié et al. 2016; Veselié et al. 2017: Kocis Tubi¢ et al. 2018; Radenkovié et al. 2018a). The Merodon avidus-nigritarsis lineage was confirmed as one of four main lineages in the genus Merodon, along- side with three other lineages: albifrons+desuturinus, aureus and natans. Likov et al. (2019) presented a phylogenetic inference where the Merodon avidus-nigritarsis lineage was resolved in a similar way as in the studies by Sasié et al. (2016) and Radenkovié et al. (2018b). In the same study, Likov et al. (2019) divided the 82 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) avidus-nigritarsis lineage into 10 species groups (namely M. aberrans, M. aurifer, M. avidus, M. clavipes, M. fulcratus, M. italicus, M. nigritarsis, M. pruni, M. serrulatus, and M. tarsatus groups), and five species were not included in any of these species groups (i.e., M. clunipes Sack, 1913, M. crassifemoris Paramonov, 1925, M. eumerusi Vuji¢, Radenkovié & Likov, 2019, M. murinus Sack, 1913, and M. ottomanus Hurk- mans, 1993). The Merodon serrulatus species group includes taxa with a characteristic basolateral protrusion on the posterior surstyle lobe (Fig. 1). Based on recently published data, this group contains six already described species, i.e., Merodon bequaerti Hurkmans, 1993, M. hirsutus Sack, 1913, M. kawamurae Matsumura, 1916, M. sacki (Paramonov, 1936), and M. serrulatus (Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822) (Likov et al. 2019). In this study, we present a taxonomic review of the serrulatus species group based on a detailed examination of material gathered as a part of our long-term field research in the Palaearctic region, especially in the Mediterranean and the Middle East. Our aims are 1. to review materials stored in several major entomological institutions and private collections holding specimens of this group; 2. to define and describe the taxa within the serrulatus species group, including new species; 3. to infer the phylogenetic relationships among the members of this species group using mtDNA COI gene and the 28S rRNA gene; and 4. to present the first data about the preimaginal morphology of the M. serrulatus species group. Materials and methods Material examined Most of the recently collected specimens were sampled by sweep net. Further speci- mens of the Merodon serrulatus species group were sourced from collections deposited in museums and universities which are listed below. Consisted total of 1,083 speci- mens collected from 1837 to 2018 across 22 countries (i.e., Algeria, China, Croatia, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Montenegro, Morocco, North Macedonia, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Syria, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Turk- menistan, and Uzbekistan) were studied for the present study. The information on labels of the material examined is provided for each studied specimen in the following order: country name, a bullet point (indicating the begin- ning of a material citation), number and sex of specimen(s), locality data, geographi- cal coordinates, altitude, collection date, collector(s) followed by “leg.”, institutional acronym and specimen codes/unique identifiers (“to” indicates range). The specimens are listed alphabetically by country and subsequently by increasing latitude (south to north) within each country. In the quotations of the type specimens’ original label data, double quotation marks were used to indicate separate labels, and the slash was adopted to indicate a new line within a label, with additional details and interpreta- tions provided in square brackets, where applicable. Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 83 Institutional acronyms A. S. coll. CEUA D. D. coll. EMIT FSUNS G. V. W. coll. GLAHM J. T. S. coll. J. v. S. coll. M. B. coll. M. H. coll. MAegean MNHN MZH NBCN NHMUK NHMW NMNH NMPC NMS S. K. coll. S. S. coll. SIZK SZMN TAUI Axel Ssymank collection, Achtberg, Germany (ssymanka@t-online.de) Colecci6n Entomoldogica de la Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain Dieter Doczkal collection, Munich, Germany (dieter.doczkal@gmail. com) Entomological Museum of Isparta, Isparta, Turkey Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia Guy Van de Weyer collection, Reet (Rumst), Belgium (guido.vandew- eyer@skynet.be) Hunterian Zoology Museum, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK John T. Smit collection, Utrecht, the Netherlands (John.Smit@natura- lis.nl) Jeroen van Steenis collection, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (jvanstee- nis! @gmail.com) Miroslav Bartak collection, Prague, Czech Republic (bartak@af.czu.cz) Martin Hauser collection, Sacramento, USA (martin.hauser@cdfa. ca.gov) The Melissotheque of the Aegean, University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Greece Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Naturalis Biodiversity Center [formerly known as the National Mu- seum of Natural History (RMNH)], Leiden, The Netherlands Natural History Museum, London, UK Museum of Natural History (Naturhistorisches Museum Wien), Vi- enna, Austria The Department of Entomology, of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA National History Museum, Prague, Czech Republic National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh, UK Sakari Kerppola collection, Helsinki, Finland (sakari.kerppola@hel- sinkinet.fi) Stileyman Saribiyik collection, Kastamonu, Turkey I.I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology of National Academy of Sci- ences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine Siberian Zoological Museum of the Institute of Systematics and Ecol- ogy of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel 84 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) WML World Museum Liverpool, Liverpool, UK ZHMB Zoological (Zoologisches) Museum of the Humboldt University, Ber- lin, Germany ZMKU Zoological Museum, State University of Kiev, Kiev, Ukraine ZMUC Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Univer- sity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Taxonomic study of adults The type material of all described species of the Merodon serrulatus species group were studied, with the exception of the type material of Merodon trizonus (Szilady, 1940) because the type specimens are lost. To study the male genitalia, dry specimens were relaxed in a closed pot containing water to ensure high humidity levels, and the genitalia were extracted using an insect pin with a hooked tip. Genitalia were cleared by boiling them individually in tubes of water-diluted KOH pellets for 3-5 minutes. This was followed by brief immersion in acetic acid to neutralize the KOH, immersion in ethanol to remove the acid, and storage in microvials containing glycerol. Specimens’ measurements were taken in dorsal view with a micrometer and are presented as ranges. Body length was measured from the lu- nule to the end of the abdomen. Drawings were made using a FSA 25 PE drawing tube attached to a binocular microscope Leica MZ16. Specimens photographs were captured by a Nikon D7100 camera connected to a personal computer, as well as a Leica DFC 320 digital camera attached to a Leica MZ16 binocular microscope. After photograph- ing, CombineZ software (Hadley 2006) was used in order to create composite image with an extended depth of field, created from the in-focus areas of each image. Terminology adopted in the morphological descriptions follows Thompson (1999) and, for male genitalia, Marcos-Garcia et al. (2007), while the term “fossette” follows Doczkal and Pape (2009). Localities were geo-referenced in Google Earth (Google Inc, California, USA, https://www.google.com/earth; accessed on 10.02.2019). Geographic coordinates of localities were represented in GenGIS (v 2.5.3) (Parks et al. 2013) in order to create distributional maps. The study of preimaginal morphology Sampling A targeted search for immature Merodon hoverflies was conducted in the chestnut forest of Agiassos, Lesvos Island (Greece). Abundant population of M. serrulatus and other Merodon species were found at this locality. Searches for larvae were carried out during a field trip from February 27 to March 10 2006, as owing to their biological cycle, these Merodon species would be in immature stages (larvae or pupae) during Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 85 this period. An area of ca. 3m’, where the presence of many bulb species and adults of Merodon were reported the previous year was selected. The whole area was exca- vated to a depth of approximately 20 cm and the soil was sieved searching for the larvae. Only one larva (third larval stage) was found in the soil surrounding bulbs of different plant genera, such as Fritillaria Tourn. ex L., Gagea Salisb., Muscari Miller, and Ornithogalum L. This solitary larva was kept in a plastic container with the soil in which it had been found at room temperature until it pupated two days later. The adult of M. opacus sp. nov. emerged on 21 March 2006 after spending 17 days in the pupal stage. Morphological study The cephalopharyngeal skeleton was removed from the antero-ventral margin of the puparium using entomological pins. After dissection, the cephalopharyngeal skeleton was soaked in 10% KOH and heated for 15 min in order to remove the remaining tissues attached, after which it was soaked for a few minutes in acetic acid followed by 70% ethanol. Once the tissues had been cleared, the skeleton was preserved in glycerin. Debris adhering to the puparial integument was removed with pins and brushes and by placing the specimens in an ultrasonic cleaner for a few minutes. The cleaned speci- men was mounted on stubs and was examined with a scanning electron microscope (S3000N Hitachi) at 20 kV using variable-pressure (or low vacuum) mode, as this technique allows a direct evaluation of the specimens without coating the samples with gold. The stereomicroscope Olympus SZX16 (equipped with Olympus U-TVO.5XC-3 camera) was used for the examination and to capture images of the puparium (general view) and the cephalopharyngeal skeleton. Dimension measurements (in mm) were performed on preserved specimens using a Leica MZ9.5 binocular microscope. The terminology for immature stages adopted here follows Rotheray (1993) and Rotheray and Gilbert (1999), whereas certain characters of the cephalopharyngeal skeleton are determined in line with Hartley (1963), and our morphological character descriptions are based on Merodon puparia descriptions provided by other authors (Heiss 1938; Stuckenberg 1956; Ricarte et al. 2008, 2017; Preradovié et al. 2018). The studied material has been deposited at the University of Alicante, Spain (CEUA). Molecular analysis The specimens subjected to molecular analysis are presented in Supplementary file 8: Table 1. DNA voucher specimens were deposited in FSUNS, EMIT, SZMN, and MZH. The genomic DNA of each specimen was extracted from two or three legs using a slightly modified SDS extraction protocol (Chen et al. 2010). For this pur- pose, the D2-3 region of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA gene and the mitochondrial protein-coding cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene were amplified. Primer pair F2 and 3DR was used for the amplification of 28S rRNA gene region (Belshaw et al. 2001), whereas C1-J-2183 (alias Jerry) and TL2-N-3014 (alias Pat) primer pair 86 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) (Simon et al. 1994) was chosen for 3'-end of COI gene, and for 5'-end COI gene, we used LCO1490 and HCO2198 primer pair (Folmer et al. 1994). The PCR reactions were carried out according to Kodis Tubié et al. (2018). The amplification products were enzymatically purified by Exonuclease I and FastAP Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase enzymes (ThermoScientific, Lithuania) and sequenced using only forward primers on an ABI3730x1 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at the Finnish Institute for Molecular Medicine (FIMM), Helsinki, Finland. Data analysis In order to establish the systematic position and composition of the Merodon serrulatus group, samples representing the four main Merodon lineages were analyzed following the approaches described by Sasié et al. (2016) and Radenkovié et al. (2018b), while two further Merodontini species served as outgroups, i.e., Platynochaetus macquarti Loew, 1862 and Eumerus grandis Meigen, 1822 (see Supplementary file 8: Table 1 for GB accession numbers of all analyzed species and outgroups). Alignment of the obtained COI sequences was achieved using the Clustal W algorithm (Thompson et al. 1994) implemented in BioEdit (Hall 1999), while rRNA 28S gene was aligned by the multiple alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT) program (Katoh et al. 2005, 2009), version 7, which implements iterative refinement methods (Katoh and Standley 2013). The E-INS-i strategy was chosen (Katoh et al. 2009). All sequences in the analyzed two- gene dataset (concatenated COI and 28S rRNA gene sequences) were trimmed to equal lengths. Phylogenetic tree construction was performed by conducting Maximum Parsi- mony (MP) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses. The parsimony analysis was con- ducted using NONA (Goloboff 1999), spawned with the aid of ASADO, version 1.85 (Nixon 2008), using the heuristic search algorithm (settings: mult*1,000, hold/100, max trees 100,000, TBR branch swapping). GTRGAMMA model was determined as the best choice model for the analysed dataset using MEGA 7 (Kumar et al. 2016). The dataset was divided into two partitions: COI gene and 28S rRNA gene. The ML tree was constructed by RAxML 8.2.8 (Stamatakis 2014) using the CIPRES Science Gate- way (Miller et al. 2010) and applying the general time-reversible (GTR) evolutionary model with a gamma distribution (GTRGAMMA) (Rodriguez et al. 1990). Nodal sup- port was estimated using nonparametric bootstrapping with 1,000 replicates for both MP and ML trees, which were rooted on Platynochaetus macquarti. Results Merodon serrulatus group Diagnosis. Member species of the Merodon serrulatus species group exhibit a distinc- tive and characteristic basolateral protrusion (lateral hump) on the posterior surstyle lobe (Fig. 1A, B: bp, 6: bp, 14C: bp). They are relatively large (11-15 mm) species with Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 87 Figure |. Merodon serrulatus male genitalia. A Epandrium, lateral view B Epandrium, ventral view C, D Posterior surstyle lobe, lateral view E Hypandrium, lateral view F Part of hypandrium, ventral view G Aedeagus, lateral view. Abbreviations: al—anterior surstyle lobe, bp—basolateral protrusion, c—cercus, |-lin- gula, pl—posterior surstyle lobe, s—lateral sclerite of aedeagus. Scale bar: 0.2 mm. a dark scutum and white microtrichose fasciae (at least in females) on the dark olive brown terga 2—4 (as in Fig. 2); tergum 2 usually with a pair of reddish orange lateral maculae. Antennae dark brown (as in Fig. 5). 88 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Figure 2. Merodon serrulatus body parts, dorsal view. A thorax, male B thorax, female C abdomen, male D abdomen, female. Scale bar: 2 mm. Basoflagellomere 1.5—2.2 times as long as wide, usually obviously concave dor- sally (as in Fig. 3A, D, G, J). Scutum covered with erect, usually yellow pile. Pile on metasternum erect, and as long as those on metacoxa. Posterior part of mesocoxa bare, without long pile. Legs mostly black, without spinae or other protuberances (as in Fig. 4). Metafemora incrassate (as on Fig. 4). Tarsi black dorsally and dark brown ventrally. Abdomen elongated, narrow and tapering (as on Fig. 2), slightly longer than scutum Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 89 \ ‘ \ Figure 3. Merodon serrulatus antenna. A outer side, lateral view, male (Spain) B inner side, lateral view, ye — male (Spain) C dorsal view, male (Spain) D outer side, lateral view, female (Spain) E inner side, lateral view, female (Spain) F dorsal view, female (Spain) G outer side, lateral view, male (Greece) H inner side, lateral view, male (Greece) I dorsal view, male (Greece) J outer side, lateral view, male (Russia). Abbrevia- tion: f-fossette. Scale bar: 1 mm. and scutellum together. Male genitalia: apical part of anterior surstyle lobe more or less of rhomboid or triangular in shape (as on Fig. 1A: al, C, D), covered with dense short pile; posterior surstyle lobe oval with basolateral protrusion (lateral hump) (Fig. 1A, 90 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Figure 4. Merodon serrulatus, lateral view. A, C metatrochanter, metafemur and metatibia B, D-F metaleg. A-B male (Spain) C female (Spain) D male (France) E male (Greece) F male (Russia). Scale bar: 2 mm. B: bp, 14C: bp); cercus rectangular, without prominences (Fig. 1A: c). Hypandrium elongated and sickle shaped (Fig. 1E); lateral sclerite of aedeagus finger-like with basal thorn-like process (Fig. 1G: s); lingula usually present (as on Fig. 1E: 1). Intraspecific variability. In most of the taxa in the Merodon serrulatus species group, the length of pile on the metafemur and the presence of microtrichia on the scutum and terga is highly variable among specimens of the same species. Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 91 i Figure 5. Merodon serrulatus head. A lateral view, male B dorsal view, male C lateral view, female D dor- sal view, female. Scale bar: 2 mm. The Merodon serrulatus species group consists of 13 species, namely M. bequaerti, M. defectus sp. nov., M. disjunctus sp. nov., M. hirsutus, M. kawamurae, M. medium sp. nov., VM. nigrocapillatus sp. nov., M. nigropunctum sp. nov., M. opacus sp. nov., M. sacki, M. serrulatus, M. sophron Hurkmans, 1993, and M. trianguloculus sp. nov. Taxonomy and nomenclature of the species belonging to the Merodon serrulatus species group Merodon bequaerti Hurkmans, 1993 Figs 8A, B, 9A—C, J, 10A, B, 11A—C Diagnosis. Large (8—11.9 mm), dark brown species with pairs of narrow microtrichose fasciae on terga 2—4 in males, in some specimens absent; metafemur with long pile on 92 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Figure 6. Male genitalia, surstylus, lateral view. A Merodon serrulatus, Spain B Merodon serrulatus, France C Merodon serrulatus, Greece (Pindos) D Merodon serrulatus, Greece (Olympos) E Merodon serrulatus, Greece (Peloponnese) F Merodon serrulatus, Montenegro G Merodon serrulatus, Russia H Merodon me- dium sp. nov. G, H margin of anterior surstyle lobe marked with arrow. Abbreviation: bp—basolateral protrusion. Scale bar: 0.2 mm. ventral margin; the longest pile as long as one third to half of width of metafemur (Fig. 8); apical part of anterior surstyle lobe rhomboid shape, covered with dense, short pile, and strong dark brown marginal pile on posterior surstyle lobe (Fig. 9A: al, J); females with very narrow microtrichose fasciae on terga 2—4 and sparse pilosity on ventral margin of metafemur, only with few longer pile. Similar to Merodon sacki but differs in a less curved metafemur and generally shorter body pile in males, clearly visible on tergum 4 (Fig. 10), and by well separated anterior and posterior surstyle lobe (Fig. 9A), almost fused in M. sacki (Fig. 9D). Related to M. sophron, but differs in more incrassate metafemur (Fig. 8A, D), longer pile on ventral margin of metafemur in both sexes (Fig. Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group ie ) aan eS \ ° peo Se _ ie Uy ad f Jisy > fi: AEST S Gi OM. bequaerti @ M. defectus sp.nov. @M. disjunctus sp. nov. @M. hirsutus OM. kawamurae @M. medium sp. nov. O M. nigrocapillatus sp.nov. @M.nigropunctum sp.nov. @M.opacussp.nov. @M. trianguloculus sp. nov. @ M. sacki O M. serrulatus @ MM. sophron Figure 7. Distribution map of Merodon serrulatus species group. ae Figure 8. Metaleg, lateral view. A Merodon bequaerti, male B Merodon bequaerti, female C Merodon sacki, male D Merodon sophron, male. Scale bar: 2 mm. 94 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) b Figure 9. Male genitalia. A Merodon bequaerti, epandrium, lateral view B Merodon bequaerti, epan- drium, ventral view C Merodon bequaerti, hypandrium, lateral view D Merodon sacki, epandrium, lateral view E Merodon sacki, epandrium, ventral view F Merodon sacki, hypandrium, lateral view G Merodon sophron, epandrium, lateral view H Merodon sophron, epandrium, ventral view | Merodon sophron, hypan- drium, lateral view J Merodon bequaerti, anterior surstyle lobe, lateral view K Merodon sophron, anterior surstyle lobe, lateral view. Abbreviations: al—anterior surstyle lobe, bp—basolateral protrusion, |—lingula, pl-posterior surstyle lobe. Scale bar: 0.2 mm. Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 95 8), and presence of dense, dark brown marginal pile on apical part of anterior surstyle lobe (Fig. 9A, J), less dense and light yellow in M. sophron (Fig. 9G, K ). Redescription (based on the type material and additional specimens). Male. Head. Antennae black to dark brown; basoflagellomere 1.7—2.1 times as long as wide, and 2.3 times as long as pedicel, concave dorsally with acute apex; fossette dorsolateral (Fig. 11); arista dark and thickened at basal one third, covered with dense microtrichia; arista 1.4—1.7 times as long as basoflagellomere (Fig. 11A, B); face and frons black with gray microtrichia, face covered with dense whitish gray, and frons with yellowish gray pile; oral margin shiny with microtrichose lateral areas; lunule shiny black, bare; eye con- tiguity 10—12 facets long; vertex isosceles, shiny covered with golden microtrichia in front of ocellar triangle; vertex with long, pale whitish yellow pile mixed with black pile on the ocellar triangle; ocellar triangle equilateral; occiput shiny, with gray-yellow pile, covered with a dense, gray microtrichia in ventral half; eyes covered with dense pile. Thorax. Scutum and scutellum black with bronze luster, covered with dense, erect, yellow pile; scutum at wing basis with short black pile, in some specimens with fas- cia of black pile between wing basis; scutum with two or more microtrichose vit- tae, anteriorly connected and posteriorly reaching the scutellum; posterodorsal part of anterior anepisternum, posterior anepisternum (except anteroventral angle), ante- rior anepimeron, dorsomedial anepimeron, and posterodorsal and anteroventral parts of katepisternum with long, pale yellow pile and grayish microtrichia; wings entirely covered with microtrichia; wing veins brown; calypteres and halteres pale yellow; legs without spinae or other protuberances; legs mostly black, except brown tarsi ventrally in some specimens; pile on legs pale yellow, except black pile at apical one fourth of metafemur; metafemur curved and incrassate, ca. three times longer than wide; pile on postero- and anteroventral surface long, and ca. one third to half of width of metate- mur, slightly longer than pile on dorsal margin (Fig. 8A). Abdomen. Wide, tapering, 1.2 times longer than mesonotum; terga dark brown to black, with or without pairs of narrow microtrichose fasciae; tergum 2 with orange lateral maculae; pile on terga all yellow, except few black pile on medial part of terga 3 and 4 in some specimens (Fig. 10A, B); sterna dark brown, covered with long whitish/yellow pile. Male genitalia. Apical part of anterior surstyle lobe rhomboid shape, 1.5 times longer than wide, covered with dense, short pile, and strong dark brown marginal pile (Fig. 9A: al, J); posterior surstyle lobe oval (Fig. 9A: pl) with basolateral protrusion (lateral hump) (Fig. 9A, B: bp); hypandrium sickle-shaped, without lateral projections; lingula small (Fig. 9C: I). Female. Similar to the male except for normal sexual dimorphism and for the following characteristics: antennae with rounded tip, basoflagellomere 1.7—1.9 times longer than wide (Fig. 11C); frons with microtrichose vittae along eye margins; frons covered with pilosity of variable color, from mostly gray-yellow until predominantly black; ocellar triangle covered with black pile; ventral margin of metafemur with sparse pilosity, only few pile longer (Fig. 8B); lateral side of terga, anterior two third of ter- gum 2 and all tergum 5 with yellow pile; terga 2-4 with short adpressed black pile and with very narrow microtrichose fascia. 96 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Figure 10. Abdomen of males. A Merodon bequaerti, dorsal view B Merodon bequaerti, lateral view C Merodon sacki, dorsal view D Merodon sacki, \ateral view. Scale bar: 2 mm. Distribution. Merodon bequaerti is distributed in north-western Africa (Algeria, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia) (Fig. 7). Ecology. Preferred environment: unimproved montane grassland, including open, grassy areas in pine forest or Mediterranean scrub. Flowers visited: no data. Flight pe- riod: February-June. Type material. Holotype [original designation by Hurkmans (1993: 194)]: male. Orig- inal label: “Merodon bequaerti | spec. nov. HOLOTYPE | 3. W Hurkmans 1988.” [red label handwritten], “Merodon / parietum | Mg 3” [label handwritten], “Noiseux Oran / Algeria / Dr. J. Bequaert” “23-IV-10” [handwritten on the back side] (MNHN) (See Supplementary file 1: Figure 1A). Paratype: female. Same label data as holotype (MNHN) (studied). Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 97 Figure | 1. Antenna. A Merodon bequaerti, outer side, lateral view, male B Merodon bequaerti, inner side, lateral view, male C Merodon bequaerti, outer side, lateral view, female D Merodon sacki, outer side, lateral view, male E Merodon sacki, inner side, lateral view, male F Merodon sacki, dorsal view, male G Merodon sophron, outer side, lateral view, male H Merodon sophron, inner side, lateral view, male | Merodon sophron, outer side, lateral view, female. Scale bar: 1 mm. Other material. ALcErta * 1 @; Kabylie, Tikjda; 36°27'00"N, 4°07'60"E; 28 Jun. 1954; NBCN « 1 Fee er Cee Ne PEN RenpRNe - Syne wes nerernty Sent 29 -Ge 2p-—eee s SEs 10 Scutum without black pile, except few black setae at wing basis in some speci- mens; terga 2—4 with a conspicuous microtrichose fasciae (as on Fig. 21A)...9 Scutum with black pile, at least on fascia between wing basis; terga 2—4 with a less conspicuous microtrichose fasciae (as on Fig. 2A) wo... ceeeeseeeeeeeeeeees eevee peers tem, Merodon serrulatus (Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822) (part) Dorsolateral pile on metafemur dense and longer (Fig. 13C); terga with longer and erect pile (Fig. 21F); tergum 2 shiny; posterior surstyle lobe with big lat- eral hump, clearly visible in ventral view (Fig. 14E, F: bp); distribution: Syria, Israel and south-eastern Turkey (Fig. 7)........... Merodon hirsutus Sack, 1913 Dorsolateral pile on metafemur shorter (Fig. 13A); terga with shorter pile, adpressed at tergum 4 (Fig. 21C); tergum 2 dull; posterior surstyle lobe with small lateral hump, less distinct in ventral view (Fig. 14H, I: bp); distribu- tion: Lesvos Island (Greece) and western Turkey (Fig. 7) ......ceseeseeeeseeseeeees FEE NE eh ek TR ALS ne ANY SE Merodon opacus sp. nov. Terga 3 and 4 with a pair of broad silver microtrichose maculae (Fig. 23C); scutum with characteristic silver microtrichose ornamentation (Fig. 23A); distribution: Turkmenistan (Fig. 7) ........... Merodon trianguloculus sp. nov. Terga 3 and 4 without or with a less conspicuous pair of broad silver micro- trichose tasciae{as-on Piet) OM sites eta cn uacs cadence ea Rognvon dean doncdanes Sareea 11 Terga 3 and 4 without microtrichose fasciae..........scseesseseeseceseeseeeeeeseeaeeeee 12 Terga 3 and 4 with a pair of white microtrichose, oblique fasciae (as on Fig. S04 Up kanes dbtmnenty sala, / creel renin cbetils senha chee Rel, Pesmnlardgrert ie (PR Rea Marrs | 13 Metafemur strongly curved (Fig. 8C); body pile longer, clearly visible on ter- eum 4 (Fig. 10D); distribution: Iberian Peninsula (Fig. 7)... seeeseeeeeeeees ees eae ae Re En Eee ee oe Merodon sacki (Paramonov, 1936) Metafemur less curved (Fig. 8A); body pile shorter, clearly visible on tergum 4 (Fig. 10B); distribution: north-west Africa (Fig. 7)......sesceeesseseeeeeeceeeeees tet et ok oo te eee Merodon bequaerti Hurkmans, 1993 (part) 142 13 14 15 16 ii, 18 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Antennae reddish yellow; basoflagellomere short and broad, ca. 1.2 times as long as wide, with large dorsal to dorsolateral fossette (Fig. 19E—G); tergum 2 with large reddish yellow lateral maculae (Fig. 23E); tergum 3 laterally red- dish or brown; tibiae and tarsi partly reddish brown; metafemur incrassate with long pilosity as long as half of width of metafemur (Fig. 22A); distribu- tion: Japan and China (Fig. 7) ..... Merodon kawamurae Matsumura, 1916 Antennae dark brown/black; basoflagellomere elongated; legs mostly black .... 14 Abdomen broad, tergum 2 at least 2.5 times wider than long (as on Fig. 24A); metatemurinerassate-and.curved fas: OnsFig FOG) ict. cvccrsnrosncthvceconnpencestvuece 15 Abdomen narrower, tergum 2 ca. two times wider than long (as on Fig. 2); metafemur less incrassate and with almost straight lateral margin (as on PLE ie letcecet tas ecteseeigest vain entangling ech eabhimncbitn cade reupltr bested etn etek enti iccuatvsntens 16 Pile on ventral margin of metafemur very short (Fig. 22C); distribution: Grete Islands Greece) (Fie. F))fsssccseSi teases eeens Merodon medium sp. nov. Pile on ventral margin of metafemur long and dense (Fig. 8A); distribution: north-west Africa (Fig. 7)....... Merodon bequaerti Hurkmans, 1993 (part) Male genitalia: basolateral protrusion (lateral hump) on posterior surstyle lobe reduced (Fig. 14A: bp); distribution: western Turkey (Fig. 7) ............ Be Sh ED ch ud le ie RM Bette le eek OriesteiT ee Merodon defectus sp. nov. Male genitalia: basolateral protrusion (lateral hump) on posterior surstyle lobe well developed (as on Fig. 1, 6: bp), visible at least from ventral view Gesteceal 225 Gis 0) 0) ener Ren oe Se RoR aE SR ee 17 Medial fossette-alnserity israel Tel) hcl shane cautastlog cour tesvesttea chaleencsioeutct 18 Medialtrossette*preseiit (F115 B)tirk ists. Sst oseeB eh ome venutro Soma cohol eS caiai, Pe, eae... wee Merodon serrulatus (Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822)° GenBank acc. no. MN623564-MN623581; distribution: Palaearctic, ex- tending from France in the west to Turkey in the south-east, and to Siberia LOWARGHORLNE CASte UIC’. 72), Bastyr wheyrowmius vhstinavaes hau nteaV neal hor eea WL wwed tasawts Seawees eaten Sete maul hae Merodon serrulatus (Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822) (part) GenBank acc. no. MN623540; distribution: north-west Africa (Fig. 7) ........ eee ne ae Pete ee ee Merodon sophron Hurkmans, 1993 Teroum2-dark(as.on Fie. 26C 1) Sse weet ee 20° Tergum 2 with reddish lateral maculae (as on Fig. 23F) oo. eeeeeeeeeeee 22 Black species (Fig. 26C, D); body covered with predominantly black pilosity, especially on thorax; distribution: Tajikistan (Fig. 7) oe... ee eesesseeseeeeeseeeeeeees prt Fie Shs eee eka gts oc hein shane Merodon nigrocapillatus sp. nov. Species with olive-brown reflection, predominantly covered with pale pile....21 Pile on dorsolateral margin of metafemur long (Fig. 13D); distribution: Syria and south-east Turkey (Fig. 7) ......sceeeeeseeeee Merodon hirsutus Sack, 1913 Pile on dorsolateral margin of metafemur short (Fig. 13B); distribution: Les- vos Island (Greece) and western Turkey (Fig. 7) .... Merodon opacus sp. nov. * part: Iberian populations ** unknown female of Merodon nigropunctum sp. nov. probably keys out here 22, 23 24 25 26 27 Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 143 Metafemur with long pile on the entire surface of ventral margin (as on 22B) (unknown female of Merodon sacki (Paramonov 1936), probably keys out |S 2) SR en al pace nes rane REN nih iP Sa RA RRND xpi ean NE Nhs Dhiea t aah eae aR 23 Metafemur with mostly short pile on ventral margin (as on Fig. 4C)........ 27. Scutum with characteristic silver microtrichose ornamentation (Fig. 23B); terga 3 and 4 with broad lateral microtrichose fasciae; distribution: Turk- MICO SLATIE HIS. 27 \cactornatted .Sotut Ratt Sao Muale Merodon trianguloculus sp. nov. Scutum with indistinct microtrichose vittae; terga 3 and 4 with narrower Figcieed Mactisleoiselelo’ehiom 7 h(c penance Soom nf Sea ee Ronin 24 Scutum at wing basis with only yellowish pilosity; metafemur with long, devisedoisal piles OmgiGr a2 By as sustestunteeediabes tsa etens oun ieteatied 25 Scutum at wing basis with short black pile; metafemur with sparse dorsal pile (aston hig: Oi) hm ser teen teen: emer a sea rosea ase een dela eves ntact nemo 26 Blackish species; terga 3 and 4 with broad lateral microtrichose fasciae; baso- flagellomere dark brown to black; distribution: Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan CVC a7) cues Meaierevh Sento g ou inever air enanelercsnngegacesuaces3 Merodon disjunctus sp. nov. Brownish species; terga 3 and 4 with narrower lateral microtrichose fas- ciae (Fig. 23F); basoflagellomere yellowish; distribution: Japan and China (PIG a) orient Wraawecbiaccrstagtrsta ts Merodon kawamurae Matsumura, 1916 Distributions nore west 7uricd, (FIG 7). | Gea setnccstnes tadhtn anlteessr tat sdneeasgniden bdr hae, Seer Rl A NP a Asp, Rn hae Merodon bequaerti Hurkmans ,1993 Aiud |e ai T, FL Merodon serrulatus (Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822) (part) Females of these three species can be separated by distribution and genetic data: GenBank acc. no. MN623540. Distribution: North-west Africa (Fig. 7) ...... o Riodiai gaan aS eat oe ea ean hres esee Merodon sophron Hurkmans, 1993 GenBank acc. no. MN623564-MN623581. Distribution: Palaearctic, ex- tending from Iberian Peninsula in the west to Turkey in the south-east and toward Siberia in the noktnreast, (Pies) Jisse Masel ttseadeaaal ccs Aa dueasdecs a tetldesine Linh Renee ee rd Merodon serrulatus (Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822) (part) Distribution: western Turkey (Fig. 7)... eee Merodon defectus sp. nov. Molecular inference The final aligned and pruned dataset including two-gene data matrix (COI+28S rRNA) comprised 1,859 nucleotide characters (421 parsimony informative sites) pertaining to 81 specimens (79 in-group specimens of the studied genus Merodon lineages along with two outgroups). The final number of aligned sites for COI gene (concatenated 3’ and 5’ fragments of the gene) included 1,273 nucleotides, while 586 nucleotide charac- ters (with gaps) were included in analyses for the D2-3 region of the 28S rRNA gene. 144 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) AU739 Platynochaetus maquarti COOOCROO OCMC OCPROOO CHROMO EU13 Eumerus grandis: weris | Af nalans lineage OOOCOOCOMHEOO— N20 M.nanus AU760 M.chalybeus OK OCOCCAHROCOOBOCO— Y665 M.aureus 84 cocco gE EENTN GG 00800090G0G0003000RCODODOO CORE CO HOOIMBOOS 393 M.cinereus CODOCCOCODOGODOSO- DPCOCOCOSOOPOPOCOOOS! Y175 M.cabanerensis. 64 OOO OPOCOHEOCOCOCOMOODOCOCOODODOSOCOOCOMEBOOS 2078 M.desuturinus OO Sonesoceds: M. aureus lineage tris oeCOORO— Y706 M.albifrons M. albifrons+desuturinus lineage COCO en OOOO COCO OOO OOOO OHARTION ¥392 M.constans HOBOOCOOOCODOCOOPOCOMPOHHMEDS 2077 M.ruficornis 56 OS: o— $90 M.avidus OOOOCIC 95 OnmoeOCSCS0C0m Oo- Y700 M.testaceus Pe ooocoe ef Oo O— ¥1272 M.alagoezicus OR OCOOCODOCOOCECOCOROCOOO GOOG 870 M.nigritarsis on > OOSOC00Oe= 11278 M.erivanicus B4 OO oO OOO COCOOOMOMOCODODODOOO C0000 HECCOGOBOOO ¥1183 M.aurifer OOOCOCOOSO00CO— 11247 M.clunipes: 748 M.clavipes OO- Y704 M.velox OOOOCODOOODOOOIOOSOCOGOOOGOOCOOHMROEOOOBOTOD 717 M.fulcratus SXOONOOOOSIOOCOOCOSOGOIOCO oCococHe= 2083 M.ottomanus 00 —o— TS548 M.nigrocapillatus sp.n. Tajikistan $649 M.nigrocapillatus sp.n. Tajikistan AU295 M.medium sp.n. Greece,Crete 100 AU296 M.medium sp.n. Greece,Crete 54 COMODHOOCCCCODO#OOO—O— AUZ97 M.medium sp.n. Greece,Crete OOOCO00000- 000— AU298 M.medium sp.n. Greece,Crete AU299 M.medium sp.n. Greece,Crete 97 AU340 M.trizonus Morocco Il 6-— MS14 M.bequaerti Morocco . 96 97 MS15 M.bequaerti Morocco M. Bere OOOCOCOODO 84-— MS$12 M.bequaerti Morocco ngiarsis lineage MS13 M.bequaerti Morocco r— AU300 M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,Bozdag DBOCOCOCOOOOCOCOCOOOOOOCOK COCO 00000 0000- XIII MEOH IOI OI IH OI AU301 M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,Bozdag AU302 M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,Bozdag AU303 M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,Bozdag 8 Sp.n. 00000 rkey,Bozdag AU309 M.opacus sp.n. Turkey,Bozdag M. serrulatus 100 TS587 M.opacus sp.n. Greece,Lesvos group Y701 M.opacus sp.n. Greece,Lesvos TSS588 M.opacus sp.n. Greece,Lesvos 100 _ 4U778 M.sacki Spain,La Corte AU779 M.sacki Spain,La Corte 70 MS3 M.serrulatus Russia, Altai foes M.serrulatus Russia, Altai MS5 M.serrulatus Russia, Altai r— MS6 M.serrulatus Greece,Olympus 871 ws7 M.serrulatus Greece,Olympus. MS8 M.serrulatus Greece, Olympus “— MS9 M.serrulatus Greece,Olympus AU292 M.serrulatus Greece,Peloponnese 63 AU293 M.serrulatus Greece,Peloponnese 7 AU290 M.serrulatus Greece,Peloponnese AU291 M.serrulatus Greece,Peloponnese AU294 M.serrulatus Greece,Peloponnese p-O- AUS40 M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,Isparta gol AU941 M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,lsparta Lod} — auas? M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,|sparta }— AU944 M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,lsparta oe AU945 M.defectus sp.n. Turkey,Isparta AUT77 M.serrulatus Spain,La Corte 64 AU341 M.serrulatus Spain,Sierra Nevada AU342 M.serrulatus Spain,Sierra Nevada AU343 M.serrulatus Spain,Sierra Nevada AU344 M.serrulatus Spain,Sierra Nevada AU345 M.serrulatus Spain,Sierra Nevada Figure 36. Strict consensus tree of 41 most parsimonious trees from the analysis of combined COI mitochondrial and 28S nuclear genes sequences. Length 2093 steps, Consistency Index (CI) 37, Reten- tion Index (RI) 65. Bootstrap support values are depicted near nodes (2 50). Filled circles represent non- homoplasious changes and open circles are homoplasious changes. Four lineages observed in the genus Merodon, as well as the M. serrulatus group, are marked on the tree. Both obtained phylogenetic trees (Maximum Parsimony, Fig. 36 and Maximum Likelihood, Supplementary file 7: Figure 7) resolved the four previously described lineages as clades, while the M. serrulatus species group was recovered as monophy- letic within the Merodon avidus-nigritarsis lineage (MP = 54, ML = 75). Within the serrulatus species group, specimens belonging to M. nigrocapillatus sp. nov., M. medium sp. nov., M. bequaerti and M. sacki were clearly grouped together with high bootstrap support (MP = 100, ML = 100; MP = 100, ML = 100; MP = 97, ML = 94; MP = 100, ML = 100, respectively). The single sequenced specimen of M. sophron was resolved as sister taxon of M. bequaerti. Unfortunately, although morphologi- cally differentiated, specimens identified as M. defectus sp. nov. clustered with M. ser- rulatus in a clade without support, but also with MM. opacus sp. nov. in another clade without support. These three species together with M. sacki were resolved in a group with high support value. High level of inter-population molecular variability within M. serrulatus species was also detected. Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 145 Discussion Taxon delimitation and integrative taxonomy Likov et al. (2019) reported the monophyly of the Merodon avidus-nigritarsis lineage. Within this lineage, the Merodon serrulatus species group is supported in our phyloge- netic analyses. The M. serrulatus species group comprises six already described species (Merodon bequaerti, M. hirsutus, M. kawamurae, M. sacki, M. serrulatus, and M. sophron) and seven new species described here. Based on the present results, six species of this group, namely M. disjunctus sp. nov., M. kawamurae, M. medium sp. nov., M. nigrocapillatus sp. nov., M. nigropunctum sp. nov., and M. trianguloculus sp. nov., are delimited on dif- ferences of morphological characters. Moreover, two pairs of very similar species can be separated from other species of the group by some distinct characters, but the distinc- tion between the species in each pair is based on characters with more subtle differences. These two pairs are M0. bequaerti | M. sacki, with the metafemur incrassate and long pile on postero- and anteroventral surface of the metafemur, and M. hirsutus | M. opacus sp. noy., with tergum 2 dark, without yellow-orange lateral maculae in both sexes. The remaining three species within the M. serrulatus species group are morphologi- cally very similar to each other. Merodon defectus sp. nov. has subtle, but stable differ- ences in structures of the male genitalia serving as diagnostic characters (lateral hump on posterior surstyle lobe reduced). Closely related and very similar, M. serrulatus and M. sophron are distinguished by molecular data, in addition to a clear morphological diagnostic character in males (presence or absence of medial antennal fossette). Using different methodologies to assess various aspects of the diversity of the genus Merodon, previous authors (Mengual et al. 2006; Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007, 2011; Stahls et al. 2009; Radenkovié et al. 2011; Vujié et al. 2012, 2013, 2015) have shown the potential of the integrative taxonomy to indicate cryptic taxa, to define new species and to point out different evolutionary lineages. The integration of multiple data sources, combining different molecular (Popovi¢ et al. 2014, 2015; Acanski et al. 2016; Sasié et al. 2016; Kodis Tubié et al. 2018; Radenkovié et al. 2018a), morphologi- cal (Popovicé et al. 2015), distributional (Radenkovié et al. 2018a), and environmental (Popovié et al. 2015; Vujié et al. 2015; Sadié et al. 2016) information, has proven to be significant in re-evaluating taxonomic delimitations within the Merodon genus. Al- though results of this integrative approach have not been always congruent (Mengual et al. 2006; Stahls et al. 2009; Popovicé et al. 2015; Radenkovi¢ et al. 2018a). In the present study we applied this integrative approach, i.e., to combine mor- phology, genetic data, and distribution, to support the taxonomic status and systematic decisions made for the . serrulatus species group. For example, the species M. sophron and M. serrulatus, although morphologically similar, are conspicuously separated from each other based on molecular data. The same situation is found between M. bequaerti and M. sacki. In contrast, the morphologically distinct species M. defectus sp. nov., M. serrulatus, and M. opacus sp. nov. cluster together in the molecular analysis. Discord- 146 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) ance between morphological and molecular data has been observed in some previous studies concerning closely related taxa within the family Syrphidae (e.g., Stahls et al. 2009; Francuski et al. 2014; Haarto and Stahls 2014), as well as in recently conducted studies on Merodon species groups (Likov et al. 2019). In the present study the mo- lecular data for M. defectus sp. nov. show some interpopulation differentiation: while the specimens from Bozdag (Turkey) were resolved in the same cluster with MZ. opacus sp. nov., the specimens of M. defectus sp. nov. from Isparta (Turkey) and M. serrulatus were resolved in another cluster. Unfortunately, these two clades do not have sup- port and the whole cluster, including M. sacki, could be resolved in a large polytomy when collapsing nodes without high support. Different molecular profile of different populations of one species was also detected by Likov et al. (2019). The suggested rea- sons for the low COI divergence between these species are retained polymorphism or mitochondrial introgression between the taxa, as it has been hypothesized in previous studies (e.g., Stahls et al. 2009; Francuski et al. 2014; Haarto and Stahls 2014). It is important to do further taxonomic research with the populations of Merodon serrulatus with high inter-population morphological and genetic variability. These pop- ulations may be also geographically isolated and are posited to exhibit low genetic flow. The very wide distributional range of M. serrulatus, extending from Iberian Peninsula to Mongolia, is highly unusual in the genus Merodon, thus exemplifying a complex popu- lation structure that might contain evolutionary units at different levels of speciation. Immature stages One of the main reasons for the gap in extant knowledge on the immature stages of Merodon species is the difficulty of finding specimens in the field, since host plants, the larval food-plants and the breeding and oviposition sites, have not been recorded for the great majority of Merodon species (Hurkmans 1993; Rotheray 1993; Speight 2018). The description of the puparium of Merodon opacus sp. nov. in this work is based on a single specimen reared from the larva found in the soil near the bulbs of Fr- tillaria, Gagea, Muscari, and Ornithogalum. \n extant studies, the immature stages of Merodon species were linked to bulbous geophytes, mostly belonging to plant families Asparagaceae (Ricarte et al. 2008; Andri¢ et al. 2014; Preradovi¢ et al. 2018), Iridaceae (Stuckenberg 1956) and Amaryllidaceae (Heiss 1938; Ricarte et al. 2017). The morphology of the puparium of MZ. opacus sp. nov. shows similarities with the puparium of M. avidus in terms of the morphology of the posterior respiratory process (prp) and ornamentation of pupal spiracles (Preradovié et al. 2018). In fact, these spe- cies share the button-shaped prp and the poorly defined outline of the spiracular plate, whereas the spiracular openings of MM. opacus sp. nov. are less convoluted than those in M. avidus. The pupal spiracles are stout in shape (almost as long as broad) and are clearly shorter than in M. avidus, but share the reticulated ornamentation (polygonal pattern). A single larva of Merodon opacus sp. nov. was found in the ground surrounded with bulbs of different plant genera (Fritillaria, Gagea, Muscari, Ornithogalum). Recent Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 147 larval records suggest that groups of related Merodon species could have the same plant genus as a host. These close relationships could be suspected between: MZ. constans species group and Galanthus L. (Amaryllidaceae) [Popov and Mishustin (pers. comm) confirmed that eight species of the constans species group feed on bulbs of eleven snow- drop species], /Z. aureus species group and Crocus L. (Iridaceae) [Speight 2018; Popov pers. comm.], and M. geniculatus species group and Narcissus L. (Amaryllidaceae) [i.e., M. eques (Fabricius, 1805) (see Pehlivan and Akbulut 1991), M. geniculatus Strobl, 1909 (see Ricarte et al. 2017), and M. neofasciatus Stahls & Vuji¢, 2018 (see Vuji¢ et al. 2018)]. Based on these findings, we suggest that the host plant for the members of the M. serrulatus species group should be a plant genus present on its large range, extending from North Africa, throughout the entire Palaearctic region to Japan. Two bulb genera with native ranges (WCSP 2019) fitting this distribution, Gagea and Fri- tillaria (Liliaceae), might be the larval food-plants. Future research in this field could thus focus on more detailed field work in areas characterized by numerous populations of species from the M. serrulatus species group. Distribution and species diversity Being distributed from the Iberian Peninsula in the south-west, along the Mediterra- nean and Balkan Peninsula, through Turkey and southern Russia to Siberia and Mon- golia in the north-east, Merodon serrulatus is the species of the genus Merodon with the largest distributional range. Other species of the M. serrulatus species group can be found at the edges of this distributional range, albeit with a much more restricted distribution. For example, /. sacki has been found in southern Spain, VM. medium sp. nov. is endemic to Crete Island, whereas M. defectus sp. nov. and M. opacus sp. nov. have been recorded in western Turkey, with the latter species also being found on Lesvos Island, and M. Airsutus found in south-eastern Turkey, Israel and Syria. The serrulatus species group includes two North-African species, i.e., MZ. sophron restricted to Morocco, and M. bequaerti more widely distributed along the Mediterranean coast of the African continent. Only one species of the group, M@. kawamurae, is found in the Far East of the Palearctic region, i.e., in central and south-eastern China and Ja- pan. It is worth noting that four of the seven newly described species are distributed in Central Asia, the central and somewhat isolated part of the distribution range of the M. serrulatus species group. Merodon disjunctus sp. nov. is found in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, M/. nigrocapillatus sp. nov. has been collected in Tajikistan, whereas M. nigropunctum sp. nov. and M. trianguloculus sp. nov. are found in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, respectively. The genus Merodon is known to be widespread in regions such as the Mediterranean Basin, with high diversity of geophytes, whereby underground storage organs serve as larval food sources for Merodon species (Ricarte et al. 2008, 2017). Such potential for the development of a high diversity of Merodon taxa might explain their current geographi- cal distributions (Vuji¢ et al. 2011, 2013). The highest number of Merodon species and 148 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) the greatest endemicity level in the Mediterranean Basin was noted for the Anatolian region (Vuji¢ et al. 2011), which represents the main center of Merodon diversity within the Palaearctic region, along with the Iberian Peninsula (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). The high number of endemic species in the eastern Mediterranean Basin has been sug- gested to be related to the intense orogenic activity favoring isolation and allopatric speciation (Vuji¢ et al. 2011). The biologically diverse Anatolian region, characterized by a rich geological history, comprises of an extensive system of high mountain chains and closed basins, thus providing a wide range of habitats. Throughout history, differ- ent parts of this topographically complex area, connecting diverse geographic regions of Asia and Europe, have served not only as natural barriers but also as highly important refugia and corridors providing passages for species spreading (Vuji¢ et al. 2013, 2015). Central Asia is characterized by many mountains exceeding 6,500 m in elevation, as well as by major desert basins, which have thus far remained understudied. ‘This is particu- larly the case for the alpine areas, and especially in terms of the invertebrate fauna (CEPF 2017). The very diverse flora of this region harbors a large number of endemics, including many bulbous plants (CEPF 2017) which can support high diversity of Merodon taxa, in- cluding the four endemic species of the M. serrulatus species group described here. Major mountain ranges located in Central Asia represent an extensive zone for faunistic evolu- tion and differentiation, not only ecologically, but also orographically and biogeographi- cally (Mani 1968). Heterogeneous topography with various isolated habitats along altitu- dinal gradients fosters high rates of speciation, species diversity and endemism. Climatic fluctuations and tectonic processes throughout the complex geological history of this region have contributed to its unique climate and have promoted high levels of floristic diversification and alpine endemism, while also affecting the distributions and structure of many taxa (e.g., Djamali et al. 2012; Zinenko et al. 2015). Having a long history as the crossroads between east and west, this region has historically been subjected to high levels of anthropogenic disturbance that continue to the present day, and populations of many species have declined due to habitat modifications (Djamali et al. 2012; CEPF 2017). The results yielded by the present study confirm previous conclusions emphasizing the impor- tance of such underexplored regions as centers of endemicity, hosting habitats potentially harboring hidden diversity within the genus Merodon (Vuji¢ et al. 2019). Acknowledgments We thank the curators of the museums listed in the Materials and methods for facili- tating visits and loans for the study of specimens in their care. We are also indebted to our professional English language editor for linguistic revision and editing of the manuscript. This work was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Techno- logical Development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant Nos. O1173002 and 11143002, the Provincial Secretariat for Science and Technological Development (0601-504/3), the H2020 Project “ANTARES” (664387) and the Scientific and Technological Re- search Council of Turkey (TUBITAK, project number: 2130243). The work of A.V. Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 149 Barkalov was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. The authors confirm that no competing interests exist. Permission to collect biological specimens in protected areas was provided by the competent authorities. The Greek material was collected under a permit issued by Greek Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate change (130276/1222), in Tur- key by TUBITAK, and in Spain with permission N. Ref.: ENSN/FJSG/IMJ (232) (Junta de Andalucia, Consejeria de Medio Ambiente y Ordenacién del Territorio). Roles of authors: AV, LL, SRad, CPB, AB, RH, GS and SRojo performed the sam- pling; AV, LL, SRad, NKT and MD conceived and designed the study; AV, LL, SRad, NKT, MD, CPB, SR, AA, GS performed the experimental analysis, while AV, LL, SRad, NKT, MD, AS, CPB, AB, RH, SRojo, AA, GS participated in data analyses. All authors took part in draft preparation, contributed to discussions during preparation of the paper, as well as read, commented on, and approved the final version of the manuscript. References Aéanski J, Vuji¢ A, Djan M, Obreht-Vidakovié D, Stahls G, Radenkovié S (2016) Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species. European Journal of Taxonomy 237: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.237 Andrié A, Sikoparija B, Obreht D, Dan M, Preradovié J, Radenkovié S, Pérez-Banén C, Vujié A (2014) DNA barcoding applied: identifying the larva of Merodon avidus (Diptera: Syr- phidae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 54(2): 741-757. https://biotaxa.org/ AEMNP/article/view/9167/10927 Belshaw R, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Degerli N, Quicke DLJ (2001) Paraphyletic taxa and taxo- nomic chaining: evaluating the classification of braconine wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconi- dae) using 28S D2-3 rDNA sequences and morphological characters. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 73(4): 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.2001.0539 CEPF (2017) Ecosystem Profile: Mountains of Central Asia Biodiversity Hotspot. On behalf of The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). https://www.cepf.net/our-work/bio- diversity-hotspots/mountains-central-asia [Accessed on 30.03.2019] Chen H, Rangasamy M, Tan SY, Wang H, Siegfried BD (2010) Evaluation of five methods for total DNA extraction from western corn rootworm beetles. PLoS ONE 5 (8): e11963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011963 Czerny L, Strobl PG (1909) Spanische Dipteren. HI. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanis- chen Gesellschaft in Wien 59: 121-301. Djamali M, Brewer S, Breckle SW, Jackson ST (2012) Climatic determinism in phytogeo- graphic regionalization: A test from the Irano-Turanian region, SW and Central Asia. Flora 207(4): 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2012.01.009 Doczkal D, Pape T (2009) Lyneborgimyia magnifica gen. et sp. n. (Diptera: Syrphidae) from Tan- zania, with a phylogenetic analysis of the Eumerini using new morphological characters. Sys- tematic Entomology 34(3): 559-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00478.x 150 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Fabricius JC (1781) Species insectorum, exhibentes eorum differentias specificas, synonyma auctorum, loca natalia, metamorphosin, adjectis observationibus, descriptionibus. Vol. 1. impensis CE Bohnii, Hamburgi et Kilonii, 494 pp. Fabricius JC (1805) Systema antliatorum secundum ordines, genera, species, adiectis syn- onymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Apud Carolum Reichard, Brunswick, 372 + 30 pp. Francuski L, Djurakic M, Ludoski J, Hurtado P, Pérez-Bafion C, Stahls G, Rojo S, Milankov V (2014) Shift in phenotypic variation coupled with rapid loss of genetic diversity in captive populations of Eristalis tenax (Diptera: Syrphidae): consequences for rearing and potential commercial use. Journal of Economic Entomology 107: 821-832. https://doi. org/10.1603/EC13243 Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3(5): 294-299. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/7881515 Goloboff PA (1999) NONA computer program. Version 2.0. Tucuman (Argentina). https:// www.softpedia.com/get/Scienece-CAD/NONA.shtml [Accessed on 22.01.2019] Haarto A, Stahls G (2014) When mtDNA COI is misleading: congruent signal of ITS2 mo- lecular marker and morphology for North European Melanostoma Schiner, 1860 (Diptera, Syrphidae). ZooKeys 431: 93-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.43 1.7207 Hadley A (2006) CombineZ, Version 5. Published by the author. http://www.hadleyweb.pwp. blueyonder.co.uk/CZ5/combinez5.htm [Accessed on 21.11.2006] Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis pro- gram for Windows 95/98/ NTT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95—98. http://brown- lab.mbio.ncsu.edu/JWB/papers/1999Hall1 .pdf Hartley JC (1963) The cephalopharyngeal apparatus of syrphid larvae and its relationship to other Diptera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 141(2): 261-280. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1963.tb01612.x Heiss EM (1938) A classification of the larvae and puparia of the Syrphidae of Illinois exclu- sive of aquatic forms. In: Buchholz JT, Tanner FW, van Cleave HT (Eds) Illinois Bio- logical Monographs Vol. 16(4). The University of Illinois, Urbana, 1-142. https://doi. org/10.5962/bhI.title.50277 Hervé-Basin J (1929) Un nouveau Lampetia (Merodon) de Chine (Dipt. Syrphidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 69: 111-115. Hurkmans W (1993) A monograph of Merodon (Diptera: Syrphidae). Part 1. Tijdschrift Voor Entomologie 136: 147-234. ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Fourth Edition. London: The International Trust for Zoologi- cal Nomenclature. https://www.iczn.org/the-code/the-international-code-of-zoological- nomenclature/the-code-online/ Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: im- provements in performance and us-ability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772- 780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 151 Katoh K, Asimenos G, Toh H (2009) Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. In: Posada D (Ed.) Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols) Vol. 537. Humana Press, New York, 39-64. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_3 Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research 33(2): 511-518. https://doi. org/10.1093/nar/gkil 98 Kocis Tubi¢ N, Stahls G, A¢anski J, Djan M, Obreht Vidakovi¢ D, Hayat R, Khaghaninia S, Vuji¢ A, Radenkovié S (2018) An integrative approach in the assessment of species delimitation and structure of the Merodon nanus species group (Diptera: Syrphidae). Organisms Diversity & Evolution 18(4): 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127- 018-0381-7 Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analy- sis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870-1874. https://doi:10.1093/molbev/msw054 Liepa ZR (1969) Lists of the scientific works and described species of the late Dr. S. J. Para- monoy, with locations of types. The Journal of the Entomological Society of Australia (New South Wales) 5: 3-22. Likov L, Vuji¢é A, Kocis Tubi¢ N, Dan M, Velickovié N, Rojo S, Pérez-Bafién C, Veselié S, Barkalov A, Hayat R, Radenkovié S (2019) Systematic position and composition of Mero- don nigritarsis and M. avidus groups (Diptera, Syrphidae) with a description of four new species. Contributions to Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-20191414 Loew H (1862) Sechs neue europaische Dipteren. Wiener Entomologische Monatsschrift 6: 294-300 Mani MS (1968) The Alai-Pamirs and the Tien Shan. In: Mani MS (Ed.) Ecology and Biogeog- raphy of High Altitude Insects. Series Entomologica Vol. 4. Springer, Dordrecht, 229-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1339-9_10 Marcos-Garcia MA, Vuji¢ A, Mengual X (2007) Revision of Iberian species of the genus Mero- don (Diptera: Syrphidae). European Journal of Entomology 104(3): 531-572. https://doi. org/10.1441 1/eje.2007.073 Marcos-Garcia MA, Vujic A, Ricarte A, Stahls G (2011) Towards an integrated taxonomy of the Merodon equestris species complex (Diptera: Syrphidae) including description of a new species, with additional data on Iberian Merodon. The Canadian Entomologist 143(4): 332-348. https://doi.org/10.4039/n11-013 Matsumura S (1916) Thousand insects of Japan. Additamenta Vol. 2 (Diptera). Keisei-sha, Tokyo, 185-474. [In Japanese] Meigen JW (1803) Versuch einer neuen Gattungs-Eintheilung der europaischen zweifliigligen Insekten. Magazin ftir Insektenkunde 2: 259-281. Meigen JW (1822) Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europaischen zweifliigeligen Insekten. Dritter Theil. Schulz-Wundermann, Hamm, x + 416 pp. Mengual X, Stahls G, Vuji¢ A, Marcos-Garcia MA (2006) Integrative taxonomy of Iberian Merodon species (Diptera: Syrphidae). Zootaxa 1377: 1-26. http://www.eje.cz/scripts/ viewabstract.php?abstract=1262 152 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, Louisiana (USA), November 2010. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey (USA), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 Nedeljkovic Z, A¢anski J, Dan M, Obreht-Vidakovic D, Ricarte A, Vuji¢ A (2015) An integrat- ed approach to delimiting species borders in the genus Chrysotoxum Meigen, 1803 (Dip- tera: Syrphidae), with description of two new species. Contributions to Zoology 84(4): 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-08404002 Nedeljkovi¢ Z, Acanski J, Vuji¢ A, Obreht D, Dan M, Stahls G, Radenkovié S (2013) Tax- onomy of Chrysotoxum festivum Linnaeus, 1758 (Diptera: Syrphidae) — an integra- tive approach. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 169(1): 84-102. https://doi. org/10.1111/zoj.12052 Nixon KC (2008) ASADO, version 1.85 TNT-MrBayes Slaver version 2; mxram 200 (vl 5.30). Made available through the author (previously named WinClada, version 1.00.08 (2002). Available from http://www.diversityoflife.org/winclada [Accessed on 22.01.2019] Paramonov SJ (1925) Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Merodon. Encyclopédie Entomologique (B Il) Diptera 2(1): 143-160. Paramonov SJ (1936) Mareppraan Ao MoHorpacbu poay Lampetia (Merodon olim) (Diptera, Syrphidae) (Beitrage zur Monographie der Gattung Lampetia (Merodon olim). Syrphidae, Diptera). 36ipka HayKoBHx path Sooaort4Homy my3eii Ta Macrutyt 300Aorii 1 Oioaorii AH YPCP 17: 3-13. [in Ukrainan, with German summary] Parks DH, Mankowski T, Zangooei S, Porter MS, Armanini DG, Baird DJ, Langille MGI, Bei- ko RG (2013) GenGIS 2: Geospatial analysis of traditional and genetic biodiversity, with new gradient algorithms and an extensible plugin framework. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069885 Pehlivan E, Akbulut N (1991) Some investigations on the syrphid species attacking on Nar- cissus in Karaburun (Izmir) and the biology and control measures of Merodon eques (E) (Diptera). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 15: 47-81. Popovic D, Djan M, Sasié si, Snjegota D, Obreht D, Vuji¢ A (2014) Usage of Different Molec- ular Markers in Delimitation of Cryptic Taxa of Merodon avidus species complex (Diptera: Syrphidae). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica Suppl. 7: 33-38. http://acta-zoologica-bulgarica.eu/ downloads/acta-zoologica-bulgarica/2014/supplement-7-33-38.pdf Popovic D, Acanski J, Dan M, Obreht D, Vuji¢ A, Radenkovié S (2015) Sibling species delimi- tation and nomenclature of the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera: Syrphidae). European Journal of Entomology 112(4): 790-809. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2015.100 Preradovié J, Andri¢é A, Radenkovié S, Sasié Zori¢é Lj, Pérez-Bahén C, Campoy A, Vuji¢ A (2018) Pupal stages of three species of the phytophagous genus Merodon Meigen (Diptera: Syrphidae). Zootaxa 4420(2): 229-242. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4420.2.5 Radenkovic¢ S, Vuji¢ A, Stahls G, Pérez-Bafion C, Rojo S, Petanidou T, Simié S (2011) Three new cryptic species of the genus Merodon Meigen (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the island of Lesvos (Greece). Zootaxa 2735: 35-56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229041969 Radenkovié S, Sasié Zori¢é Lj, Dan M, Obreht Vidakovié D, Acanski J, Stahls G, Veli¢kovié N, Markov Z, Petanidou T, Koéis Tubié N, Vuji¢ A (2018a) Cryptic speciation in the Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 133 Merodon luteomaculatus complex (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 56(2): 170-191. https://doi. org/10.1111/jzs.12193 Radenkovié S, Veli¢kovié N, Ssymank A, Obreht Vidakovié D, Djan M, Stahls G, Veseli¢ S, Vuji¢ A (2018b) Close relatives of Mediterranean endemo-relict hoverflies (Diptera, Syr- phidae) in South Africa: Morphological and molecular evidence in the Merodon melanocerus subgroup. PLoS ONE 13(7): 0200805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200805. Reemer M, Smit JT (2007) Some hoverfly records from Turkey (Diptera, Syrphidae). Volucella 8: 135-146. Ricarte A, Marcos-Garcia MA, Rotheray GE (2008) The early stages and life histories of three Eumerus and two Merodon species (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the Mediterranean region. Entomologica Fennica 19(3): 129-141. http://www.entomologicafennica.org/Volume19/ ER 9.3/)Ricartesdt Ricarte A, Souba-Dols GJ, Hauser M, Marcos-Garcia MA (2017) A review of the early stag- es and host plants of the genera Eumerus and Merodon (Diptera: Syrphidae), with new data on four species. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0189852. https://doi-org/10.1371/journal. pone.0189852 Ricarte A, Nedeljkovié Z, Rotheray G, Lyszkowski RM, Hancock EG, Watt K, Hewitt SM, Horsfield D, Wilkinson G (2012) Syrphidae (Diptera) from the Greek island of Lesvos, with description of two new species. Zootaxa 3175: 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/ 7ootaxa. 5 Zl) Rodriguez FJLOJ, Oliver JL, Marin A, Medina JR (1990) The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142(4): 485-501. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80104-3 Rotheray GE (1993) Color guide to hoverfly larvae (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Britain and Europe. Dipterist Digest 9: 1-156. http://www.dipteristsforum.org.uk/documents/DD/df_1_9_ Colour_Guide_to%20Hoverfly_Larvae.pdf Rotheray GE, Gilbert FS (1999) Phylogeny of Palaearctic Syrphidae (Diptera): evidence from larval stages. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 127(1): 1-112. https://doi. org/10.1006/zjls.1998.0156 Sack P (1913) Die Gattung Merodon Meigen (Lampetia Meig. olim). Abhandlungen der Senck- enbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 31(4): 427-462. Sasié Lj, Aéanski J, Vuji¢ A, Stahls G, Radenkovié S, Mili¢é D, Obreht-Vidakovié D, Dan M (2016) Molecular and morphological inference of three cryptic species within the Mero- don aureus species group (Diptera: Syrphidae). PLoS ONE 11(8): e0160001. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160001 Schiner IR (1860) Vorlaufiger Commentar zum dipterologischen Theile der ‘Fauna Austriaca’, mit einer naheren Begrundung der in derselben aufgenommenen neuen Dipteren-Gattun- gen. II. Wiener Entomologische Monatsschrift 4: 208-216. Simon C, Frati KF Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved poly- merase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87(6): 651-701. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/87.6.651 154 Ante Vuji¢ et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Speight MCD (2018) Species Accounts of European Syrphidae, 2018. Syrph the Net, the Data- base of European Syrphidae (Diptera) Vol. 103. Syrph the Net publications, Dublin, 302 pp. Stahls G, Vuji¢ A, Pérez-Bafién C, Radenkovié S, Rojo S, Petanidou T (2009) COI barcodes for identification of Merodon hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of Lesvos Island, Greece. Molecular Ecology Resources 9(6): 1431-1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02592.x Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9): 1312-1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinfor- matics/btu033 Stuckenberg BR (1956) The immature stages of Merodon bombiformis Hull, a potential pest of bulbs in South Africa. Journal of Entomological Society of South Africa 19(2): 219-224. https://journals.co.za/content/JESSA/19/2/AJA00128789_4333 Szilady L (1940) Uber Palaarktische Syrphiden. Annales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 33: 34-70. Thompson FC (1999) A key to the genera of the flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of the Neo- tropical Region including descriptions of new genera and species and a glossary of taxo- nomic terms used. Contributions on Entomology, International 3: 321-378. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of pro- gressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22(22): 4673-4680. https:// doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 Veselié S, Vujicé A, Radenkovié S (2017) Three new Eastern-Mediterranean endemic species of the Merodon aureus group (Diptera: Syrphidae). Zootaxa 4254(4): 401-434. https://doi. org/10.11646/zootaxa.4254.4. 1 Vuji¢ A, Marcos-Garcia MA, Saribiyik S, Ricarte A (2011) New data on the Merodon Meigen, 1803 fauna (Diptera: Syrphidae) of Turkey, including description of a new species and changes in the nomenclatural status of several taxa. Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.) 47(1—2): 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2011.10697699 Vuji¢ A, Radenkovi¢ S, Likov L, Trifunov S, Nikoli¢ T (2013) Three new species of the Merodon nigritarsis group (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the Middle East. Zootaxa 3640(3): 442-464. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3640.3.7 Vuji¢ A, Stahls G, Acanski J, Rojo S, Pérez-Bafion C, Radenkovic S (2018) Review of the Merodon albifasciatus Macquart species complex (Diptera: Syrphidae): the nomenclatu- ral type located and its provenance discussed. Zootaxa 4374(1): 25-48. http://dx.doi. org/10.11646/zootaxa.4374.1.2 Vujic A, Radenkovié S, Likov L, Andri¢ A, Gilasian E, Barkalov A (2019) Two new enigmatic species of the genus Merodon Miegen (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the north-eastern Middle East. Zootaxa 4555(2): 187-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4555.2.2 Vuji¢ A, Radenkovié S, Aéanski J, Grkovié A, Taylor M, Senol GS, Hayat R (2015) Revision of the species of the Merodon nanus group (Diptera: Syrphidae) including three new species. Zootaxa 4006(3): 439-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4006.3.2 Vuji¢ A, Radenkovié S, Stahls G, Aéanski J, Stefanovic A, Veseli¢ S, Andri¢ A, Hayat R (2012) Systematics and taxonomy of the ruficornis group of genus Merodon (Diptera: Syrphidae). Systematic Entomology 37(3): 578-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 3113.2012.00631.x Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 159 WCSP (2019) World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botan- ic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet: http://wesp.science.kew.org [Accessed on 01.08.2019] Zinenko O, Stiimpel N, Mazanaeva L, Bakiev A, Shiryaev K, Pavlov A, Kotenko T, Kukushkin O, Chikin Y, Duisebayeva T, Nilson G, Orlovm NL, Tuniyev S, Ananjevam NB, Mur- phy RW, Joger U (2015) Mitochondrial phylogeny shows multiple independent ecologi- cal transitions and northern dispersion despite of Pleistocene glaciations in meadow and steppe vipers (Vipera ursinii and Vipera renardi). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 84: 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.12.005 Supplementary material | Figure S1 Authors: Ante Vuji¢, Laura Likov, Snezana Radenkovic, Natasa Kocis Tubi¢, Mihajla Djan, Anja Sebié, Celeste Pérez-Bafién, Anatolij Barkalov, Riistem Hayat, Santos Rojo, Andrijana Andri¢, Gunilla Stahls Data type: type specimens’ data Explanation note: A Merodon bequaerti, holotype and labels B Merodon nigrocapillatus sp. nov., holotype and labels. Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODDbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838.suppl1 Supplementary material 2 Figure S2 Authors: Ante Vuji¢, Laura Likov, Snezana Radenkovic, Natasa Kocis Tubi¢, Mihajla Djan, Anja Sebié, Celeste Pérez-Bafién, Anatolij Barkalov, Riistem Hayat, Santos Rojo, Andrijana Andri¢, Gunilla Stahls Data type: type specimens’ data Explanation note: A Merodon defectus sp. nov., holotype and labels B Merodon disjunc- tus sp. nov., holotype and labels. Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODDbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838.suppl2 156 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Supplementary material 3 Figure $3. Merodon medium sp. nov., holotype and labels Authors: Ante Vuji¢, Laura Likov, Snezana Radenkovic, Natasa Kocis Tubi¢, Mihajla Djan, Anja Sebié, Celeste Pérez-Bafién, Anatolij Barkalov, Riistem Hayat, Santos Rojo, Andrijana Andri¢, Gunilla Stahls Data type: type specimens’ data Explanation note: Merodon medium sp. nov., holotype and labels. Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODDbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838.supp13 Supplementary material 4 Figure S4 Authors: Ante Vuji¢, Laura Likov, Snezana Radenkovi¢, Natasa Kocis Tubi¢, Mihajla Djan, Anja Sebié, Celeste Pérez-Bafién, Anatolij Barkalov, Riistem Hayat, Santos Rojo, Andrijana Andri¢, Gunilla Stahls Data type: type specimens’ data Explanation note: A Merodon nigropunctum sp. nov., holotype and labels B Merodon opacus sp. nov., holotype and labels Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODDbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838.suppl4 Revision of the Merodon serrulatus group 157 Supplementary material 5 Figure $5. Merodon trianguloculus sp. nov., holotype and labels Authors: Ante Vuji¢, Laura Likov, Snezana Radenkovi¢, Natasa Kocis Tubi¢, Mihajla Djan, Anja Sebié, Celeste Pérez-Bafién, Anatolij Barkalov, Riistem Hayat, Santos Rojo, Andrijana Andri¢, Gunilla Stahls Data type: type specimens’ data Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODDbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838.suppl5 Supplementary material 6 Figure S6 Authors: Ante Vuji¢, Laura Likov, Snezana Radenkovi¢, Natasa Kocis Tubi¢, Mihajla Djan, Anja Sebié, Celeste Pérez-Bafién, Anatolij Barkalov, Riistem Hayat, Santos Rojo, Andrijana Andri¢, Gunilla Stahls Data type: type specimens’ data Explanation note: A Merodon tener, lectotype and labels B Merodon sacki, holotype and labels. Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODDbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838.suppl6 158 Ante Vujié et al. / ZooKeys 909: 79-158 (2020) Supplementary material 7 Figure S7 Authors: Ante Vuji¢, Laura Likov, Snezana Radenkovic, Natasa Kocis Tubi¢, Mihajla Djan, Anja Sebié, Celeste Pérez-Bafién, Anatolij Barkalov, Riistem Hayat, Santos Rojo, Andrijana Andri¢, Gunilla Stahls Data type: phylogenetic data Explanation note: Maximum likelihood tree based on analysis of combined COI mi- tochondrial and 28S nuclear genes sequences. Bootstrap support values of the main clades of the analysed Merodon serrulatus group of species are depicted near nodes (> 50). Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODDbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838.suppl7 Supplementary material 8 Table S1. Data for the specimens used in the molecular analysis, including Gen- Bank accession numbers Authors: Ante Vuji¢, Laura Likov, Snezana Radenkovic, Natasa Kocis Tubi¢, Mihajla Djan, Anja Sebié, Celeste Pérez-Bafién, Anatolij Barkalov, Riistem Hayat, Santos Rojo, Andrijana Andri¢, Gunilla Stahls Data type: molecular specimens’ dataset Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODDbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.909.46838.suppl8