Autonomous samplers and environmental DNA metabarcoding: sampling day and primer choice have greatest impact on fish detection probabilities

By

Jones, Devin N.
Augustine, Ben C.
Hutchins, Patrick
Birch, James M.
Yamahara, Kevan M.
Jensen, Scott
Richardson, Rodney
Trott, Regina
Campbell, James R.
Barnhart, Elliott
Sepulveda, Adam J.

Type

Article

Date of Publication

2024-9-13

Original Publication

Metabarcoding and metagenomics

Volume

8

Pages

1--23

Subjects

Autonomous samplers , biomonitoring , Edna , metabarcoding , USGS streamgage

Contributed by

Pensoft Publishers

Language

English

Published by

Bulgaria Pensoft Publishers 2017-

Identifiers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.8.122375

 

Abstract

Unprecedented rates of biodiversity loss and ecosystem function necessitate the use of rapid, efficacious, and cost-effective biomonitoring tools. The combination of autonomous samplers and high throughput sequencing (i.e., “metabarcoding”) of environmental DNA (eDNA) samples enables characterization of entire communities at high frequency and can be an important tool for conservation and management, allowing researchers to track fluctuations in biodiversity. We deployed two autonomous samplers at two U.S. Geological Survey streamgage sites in the upper Snake River (Wyoming and Idaho, USA) to collect eDNA samples from July-September 2021 and 2022 to characterize fish diversity. We used a probabilistic approach to evaluate the effects of water temperature, water discharge, filter pore size, water volume filtered, number of samples collected, timing, and primers on the probability of detecting eDNA from fish species known to be present. We detected eDNA from 13/15 species present in these areas of the Snake River. Overall, we did not find evidence that filter pore size, water volume filtered, water discharge, and water temperature affected the probability of detecting fish species’ eDNA. By contrast, primers and sampling day affected fish detection probabilities, indicating that primer choice and sampling day can either over- or under- estimate species diversity. These results indicate that users would ideally consider sampling on non-consecutive days and which primer set will maximize species detections.