Nomenclatural revision, proposals (40–44) and requests (8–10) regarding some syntaxa of the class Phragmito-Magnocaricetea Klika in Klika et Nov&#225;k 1941

Landucci, Flavia; Chytr&#253;, Milan; Iemelianova, Svitlana; Šumberov&#225;, Kateřina; Theurillat, Jean-Paul

doi:10.3897/VCS.146260

Browse by:

Article: Nomenclatural revision, proposals (40–44) and requests (8–10) regarding some syntaxa of the class Phragmito-Magnocaricetea Klika in Klika et Novák 1941

Title

Nomenclatural revision, proposals (40–44) and requests (8–10) regarding some syntaxa of the class Phragmito-Magnocaricetea Klika in Klika et Novák 1941

By

Landucci, Flavia
Chytrý, Milan
Iemelianova, Svitlana
Šumberová, Kateřina
Theurillat, Jean-Paul

Type

Article

Date of Publication

2025-11-25

Original Publication

Vegetation classification and survey

Volume

Pages

209--220

Subjects

binding decision , lectotypus , marsh vegetation , neotypus , nomen conservandum , Nomenclature , Phragmito-Magnocaricetea , Phytosociology , typus conservandum

Contributed by

Pensoft Publishers

Language

English

Published by

Sofia Pensoft Publishers 2020-

Identifiers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/VCS.146260

Cite This Publication

Article access

View Article

Copyright & Usage:

License Type URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Rights: https://biodiversitylibrary.org/permissions
Copyright Status: In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.
Rights Holder: Copyright held by individual article author(s).

Download:

All JP2 OCR PDF

expand Abstract

In the course of a comprehensive revision of the syntaxonomy and nomenclature of the class Phragmito-Magnocaricetea Klika in Klika et Novák 1941, it appeared necessary to resolve some nomenclatural issues in accordance with the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. In this article, we present five proposals and three requests for binding decisions. We also introduce the name Oenanthetalia aquaticae Hejný ex Landucci et al. ord. nov., the lectotypes of the names Phragmitetum australis Savich 1926 nom. corr., Typho-Scirpetum mucronati Tallon 1950, and Apion nodiflori Segal in Westhoff et Den Held 1969, and the neotypes of the names Oenantho aquaticae-Rorippetum amphibiae Lohmeyer 1950 and Scrophulario aquaticae-Apietum nodiflori Maas ex Segal in Westhoff et Den Held 1969. (40) Phragmitetum australis Savich 1926 nom. corr. et cons. propos. Typus: Savich 1926a: 57 (holotypus) (=) Scirpo-Phragmitetum australis W. Koch 1926 Typus: Koch 1926: 47 (holotypus). (41) Phragmition australis W. Koch 1926 nom. corr. et cons. propos. Typus: Phragmitetum australis Savich 1926 nom. corr. (typus cons. propos.) (42) Glycerio-Sparganietum neglecti W. Koch 1926 nom. dub. propos. Typus: Koch 1926: 52, tab. V, relevé 1 (lectotypus designated by Koska in Dengler et al. 2004: 371) (43) Glycerio-Sparganion Braun-Blanquet et Sissingh in Boer 1942 nom. dub. propos. Typus: Glycerio-Sparganietum neglecti W. Koch 1926 nom. dub. propos (Boer 1942: 240; holotypus) (44) Nasturtio-Glycerietalia Pignatti 1953 nom. dub. propos. Typus: Glycerio-Sparganion Braun-Blanquet et Sissingh in Boer 1942 nom. dub. propos. (Boer 1942: 240; holotypus) Taxonomic reference : POWO (2025). Abbreviations : CCCN = Committee for Change and Conservation of Names; ICPN = International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature (Theurillat et al. 2021).